The first message only ever asks one of two things.
Across 356,227 conversations in 20 sub-accounts there are 67 distinct
first messages, and every one of them is either a YES ask — "we got your photo a little while back,
are you still interested?" — or a PHOTO ask — "you applied a little while ago, could you send over a
recent photo?". The YES ask drives at 6AB (said yes, no photo). The PHOTO ask drives at N1N (sent a picture).
There is no CMN opener anywhere: CMN is only ever reached on the second step, after a reply.
268,589 people messaged, 60,365 (22.5%) ended up with a recycled code — and almost all of it is 6AB.
6AB 42,910 (16.0%) ·
CMN 8,933 (3.3%) ·
N1N 7,138 (2.7%) ·
5AB 5,030 · R 2,018.
6AB is 71.1% of every code the engine has produced.
A quarter of them were already that code before the engine said a word.
68,783 people (25.6%) already carried a 6AB row when the first
message went out, 28,409 an R and 16,146 a CMN. That is why every number on
this page is date-ordered against the first message — an undated join would count those as conversions and roughly
double the answer.
9,243 people sent a photo. 6,078 of them (65.8%) never got a code at all.
A photo is the whole point of the PHOTO ask, and only 1,396 became an N1N within 30 days
and 512 a CMN. A photo reply arrives with an empty body and an attachment, so
anything classifying on text alone cannot see it.
The funnel
| Step | People | Of those messaged |
|---|
| In the 20 sub-accounts, with a phone | 293,415 | — |
| Sent at least one SMS | 268,589 | 100% |
| Replied at all | 109,135 | 40.6% |
| Replied within 14 days of the first message | 101,306 | 37.7% |
| Sent a photo | 9,243 | 3.4% |
| Got a recycled code within 30 days | 41,496 | 15.4% |
| Got one ever after the first message | 60,365 | 22.5% |
What they became
| Family | Ever, after the first message | Within 30 days | Within 14 days | Already had it BEFORE |
|---|
| 6AB |
42,910 16.0% |
29,280 10.9% |
26,049 9.7% |
68,783 25.6% |
| N1N |
7,138 2.7% |
3,420 1.3% |
2,644 1.0% |
7,591 2.8% |
| CMN |
8,933 3.3% |
4,924 1.8% |
4,095 1.5% |
16,146 6.0% |
| 5AB |
5,030 1.9% |
2,992 1.1% |
2,145 0.8% |
9,135 3.4% |
| R |
2,018 0.8% |
1,230 0.5% |
1,056 0.4% |
28,409 10.6% |
| 4AB |
6,715 2.5% |
1,593 0.6% |
888 0.3% |
15,676 5.8% |
Read the last column first. "Became" here means a CRM lead row in that family dated strictly
after the person's first SLE message; the last column is people who already carried that family beforehand and are
therefore excluded from the first three. Join is the last 10 digits of the phone against
1,180,261 CRM lead rows, 2025-01-01 to 2026-09-14.
Hold the age of the lead constant and the YES ask beats the PHOTO ask about two to one — on replies and on codes.
On leads that were 181–365 days old when first messaged in Jul–Aug 2026, the YES ask got
18.8% replies
and 6.2% a code inside 14 days;
the PHOTO ask got 10.1%
and 3.1%.
The same holds at 91–180 days. This is the comparison that matters — the raw split below flatters the YES ask
further, because the PHOTO ask was aimed at a much older list.
Every driver, all time — outcome within 30 days
| What the first message asks for | People | Replied ≤14d | Sent a photo ≤14d | 6AB | N1N | CMN | 5AB | R | 4AB | Any code |
|---|
| YES ask — adult → 6AB |
149,404 |
85,425 57.2% |
829 0.6% |
28,625 19.2% | 1,027 0.7% | 4,199 2.8% | 2,702 1.8% | 837 0.6% | 1,592 1.1% |
37,312 25.0% |
| PHOTO ask — adult → N1N |
80,211 |
9,802 12.2% |
4,885 6.1% |
336 0.4% | 2,204 2.7% | 424 0.5% | 4 0.0% | — | — |
2,857 3.6% |
| YES ask — child → 6AB |
30,491 |
5,632 18.5% |
28 0.1% |
314 1.0% | 177 0.6% | 290 1.0% | 229 0.8% | 393 1.3% | 1 0.0% |
1,243 4.1% |
| PHOTO ask — child → N1N |
7,722 |
357 4.6% |
185 2.4% |
4 0.1% | 11 0.1% | 8 0.1% | 49 0.6% | — | — |
71 0.9% |
| other / one-off |
761 |
90 11.8% |
13 1.7% |
1 0.1% | 1 0.1% | 3 0.4% | 8 1.1% | — | — |
13 1.7% |
A person is counted under the ask in their earliest message. "Replied" is a real inbound SMS with
text; a photo reply carries no text, so it is counted separately.
The two adult asks at the same lead age — Jul–Aug 2026, outcome within 14 days
| Ask · how old the lead was | People | Replied ≤14d | Sent a photo ≤14d | 6AB | N1N | CMN | 5AB | R | 4AB | Any code |
|---|
| PHOTO ask — adult · 181–365 days |
42,809 |
4,304 10.1% |
2,051 4.8% |
85 0.2% | 1,167 2.7% | 143 0.3% | 1 0.0% | — | — |
1,343 3.1% |
| PHOTO ask — adult · 31–90 days |
3 |
0 0.0% |
0 0.0% |
— | — | — | — | — | — |
0 0.0% |
| PHOTO ask — adult · 8–30 days |
2 |
0 0.0% |
0 0.0% |
— | — | — | — | — | — |
0 0.0% |
| PHOTO ask — adult · 91–180 days |
21,302 |
3,013 14.1% |
1,310 6.1% |
141 0.7% | 582 2.7% | 218 1.0% | — | — | — |
905 4.2% |
| PHOTO ask — adult · over a year |
15,984 |
2,467 15.4% |
1,513 9.5% |
25 0.2% | 441 2.8% | 55 0.3% | 1 0.0% | — | — |
502 3.1% |
| YES ask — adult · 181–365 days |
11,060 |
2,084 18.8% |
21 0.2% |
482 4.4% | 173 1.6% | 90 0.8% | 21 0.2% | 72 0.7% | — |
690 6.2% |
| YES ask — adult · 31–90 days |
5,048 |
2,032 40.3% |
15 0.3% |
522 10.3% | 11 0.2% | 60 1.2% | 128 2.5% | 48 1.0% | — |
745 14.8% |
| YES ask — adult · 8–30 days |
12,170 |
3,616 29.7% |
30 0.2% |
374 3.1% | 114 0.9% | 341 2.8% | — | 246 2.0% | — |
922 7.6% |
| YES ask — adult · 91–180 days |
11,589 |
2,771 23.9% |
45 0.4% |
680 5.9% | 17 0.1% | 64 0.6% | 52 0.4% | 30 0.3% | — |
817 7.0% |
| YES ask — adult · over a year |
848 |
222 26.2% |
5 0.6% |
33 3.9% | 14 1.7% | 13 1.5% | — | — | — |
53 6.3% |
Jul–Aug 2026 is the only window in which both asks ran, and both are 14-day mature as of the build date.
Lead age is the first message date minus the day that phone first appears in the CRM; CRM history here starts
2025-01-01, so ages are floored, not exact. Bands under 200 people are still shown but do not carry weight.
How old the leads are when the engine first messages them
| Lead age at the first message | People | Replied ≤14d | Sent a photo ≤14d | 6AB | N1N | CMN | 5AB | R | 4AB | Any code |
|---|
| 0–7 days |
19,309 |
19,263 99.8% |
157 0.8% |
727 3.8% | — | 183 0.9% | 1 0.0% | 8 0.0% | 185 1.0% |
1,049 5.4% |
| 8–30 days |
34,506 |
9,793 28.4% |
79 0.2% |
1,319 3.8% | 443 1.3% | 814 2.4% | 76 0.2% | 817 2.4% | 101 0.3% |
3,151 9.1% |
| 31–90 days |
39,188 |
20,922 53.4% |
198 0.5% |
7,630 19.5% | 255 0.7% | 998 2.5% | 886 2.3% | 213 0.5% | 650 1.7% |
10,093 25.8% |
| 91–180 days |
63,929 |
19,368 30.3% |
1,553 2.4% |
6,353 9.9% | 758 1.2% | 943 1.5% | 590 0.9% | 84 0.1% | 337 0.5% |
8,678 13.6% |
| 181–365 days |
79,342 |
18,075 22.8% |
2,265 2.9% |
4,622 5.8% | 1,498 1.9% | 688 0.9% | 1,360 1.7% | 105 0.1% | 248 0.3% |
8,119 10.2% |
| over a year |
18,842 |
2,921 15.5% |
1,574 8.4% |
119 0.6% | 466 2.5% | 78 0.4% | 28 0.1% | 1 0.0% | 1 0.0% |
659 3.5% |
The reply rate has fallen every month for a year and a half — but so has the quality of the list.
The YES ask replied at 94.6% in Apr 2025 against
21.6% in Aug 2026.
In Apr 2025 the median lead was 0 days old when it was messaged — the engine was working that week's applicants.
In Aug 2026 the median was 107 days on the YES ask and 278 days on the PHOTO ask. Do not read this
column as the machine degrading until the age table on the previous tab has been read alongside it.
First-message month × ask — outcome within 14 days
| Month · ask | People | Replied ≤14d | Sent a photo ≤14d | 6AB | N1N | CMN | 5AB | R | 4AB | Any code |
|---|
| 2025-01 YES ask — adult |
1,993 |
1,746 87.6% |
17 0.9% |
173 8.7% | — | 50 2.5% | 1 0.1% | — | 49 2.5% |
259 13.0% |
| 2025-02 YES ask — adult |
2,940 |
2,658 90.4% |
37 1.3% |
277 9.4% | — | 87 3.0% | — | — | 48 1.6% |
402 13.7% |
| 2025-03 YES ask — adult |
9,580 |
8,761 91.5% |
64 0.7% |
1,879 19.6% | — | 358 3.7% | — | — | 76 0.8% |
2,271 23.7% |
| 2025-04 YES ask — adult |
10,225 |
9,670 94.6% |
79 0.8% |
3,005 29.4% | — | 526 5.1% | — | — | 58 0.6% |
3,559 34.8% |
| 2025-05 YES ask — adult |
7,733 |
7,223 93.4% |
70 0.9% |
2,587 33.5% | — | 370 4.8% | — | — | 51 0.7% |
2,974 38.5% |
| 2025-06 YES ask — adult |
3,516 |
3,145 89.4% |
42 1.2% |
1,246 35.4% | — | 146 4.2% | — | 1 0.0% | 32 0.9% |
1,397 39.7% |
| 2025-07 YES ask — adult |
4,677 |
4,196 89.7% |
51 1.1% |
1,669 35.7% | — | 156 3.3% | — | 19 0.4% | 37 0.8% |
1,846 39.5% |
| 2025-08 YES ask — adult |
4,425 |
3,906 88.3% |
34 0.8% |
1,537 34.7% | — | 150 3.4% | — | 26 0.6% | 56 1.3% |
1,737 39.3% |
| 2025-09 YES ask — adult |
4,556 |
4,026 88.4% |
45 1.0% |
1,754 38.5% | — | 177 3.9% | — | 18 0.4% | 34 0.7% |
1,954 42.9% |
| 2025-10 YES ask — adult |
5,478 |
4,331 79.1% |
44 0.8% |
1,793 32.7% | — | 160 2.9% | 100 1.8% | 8 0.1% | 69 1.3% |
2,095 38.2% |
| 2025-11 YES ask — adult |
4,228 |
3,174 75.1% |
27 0.6% |
1,122 26.5% | — | 102 2.4% | 183 4.3% | — | 77 1.8% |
1,458 34.5% |
| 2025-12 YES ask — adult |
5,100 |
3,522 69.1% |
22 0.4% |
1,088 21.3% | — | 117 2.3% | 340 6.7% | — | 108 2.1% |
1,621 31.8% |
| 2026-01 YES ask — adult |
6,482 |
3,951 61.0% |
31 0.5% |
1,174 18.1% | — | 103 1.6% | 329 5.1% | 1 0.0% | 88 1.4% |
1,674 25.8% |
| 2026-02 YES ask — adult |
4,673 |
2,523 54.0% |
21 0.4% |
898 19.2% | 1 0.0% | 72 1.5% | 203 4.3% | 2 0.0% | 61 1.3% |
1,201 25.7% |
| 2026-03 YES ask — adult |
5,120 |
2,224 43.4% |
23 0.4% |
777 15.2% | — | 71 1.4% | 154 3.0% | 1 0.0% | 32 0.6% |
1,026 20.0% |
| 2026-04 YES ask — adult |
5,837 |
2,340 40.1% |
29 0.5% |
723 12.4% | 5 0.1% | 74 1.3% | 138 2.4% | 1 0.0% | 11 0.2% |
948 16.2% |
| 2026-05 YES ask — adult |
6,264 |
2,464 39.3% |
32 0.5% |
832 13.3% | 1 0.0% | 53 0.8% | 111 1.8% | 2 0.0% | — |
996 15.9% |
| 2026-06 YES ask — adult |
7,300 |
2,878 39.4% |
30 0.4% |
833 11.4% | 17 0.2% | 83 1.1% | 184 2.5% | 2 0.0% | — |
1,113 15.2% |
| 2026-07 YES ask — adult |
16,043 |
5,407 33.7% |
49 0.3% |
1,367 8.5% | 30 0.2% | 270 1.7% | 169 1.1% | 3 0.0% | — |
1,828 11.4% |
| 2026-07 YES ask — child |
7,364 |
1,736 23.6% |
6 0.1% |
171 2.3% | 11 0.1% | 89 1.2% | — | — | — |
270 3.7% |
| 2026-08 other / one-off |
753 |
86 11.4% |
13 1.7% |
— | — | — | — | — | — |
0 0.0% |
| 2026-08 PHOTO ask — adult |
80,211 |
9,802 12.2% |
4,885 6.1% |
251 0.3% | 2,190 2.7% | 416 0.5% | 2 0.0% | — | — |
2,750 3.4% |
| 2026-08 PHOTO ask — child |
7,722 |
357 4.6% |
185 2.4% |
2 0.0% | 8 0.1% | 3 0.0% | 15 0.2% | — | — |
27 0.3% |
| 2026-08 YES ask — adult |
24,816 |
5,352 21.6% |
67 0.3% |
724 2.9% | 299 1.2% | 298 1.2% | 33 0.1% | 393 1.6% | — |
1,400 5.6% |
| 2026-08 YES ask — child |
10,475 |
1,932 18.4% |
13 0.1% |
49 0.5% | 75 0.7% | 109 1.0% | 87 0.8% | 184 1.8% | — |
388 3.7% |
| 2026-09 YES ask — adult |
8,418 |
1,928 22.9% |
15 0.2% |
114 1.4% | 4 0.0% | 34 0.4% | — | 209 2.5% | — |
351 4.2% |
| 2026-09 YES ask — child |
12,596 |
1,943 15.4% |
9 0.1% |
1 0.0% | 3 0.0% | 20 0.2% | 95 0.8% | 186 1.5% | — |
301 2.4% |
Cohorts under 100 people are omitted. September 2026 is part-built and 14-day immature — it is shown
for completeness and must not be read as a rate.
20 of the 23 rows in the token sheet are reachable.
API 1 has a location id (slyrSVDcRAfDjJHMiPVW) but no token in the sheet;
API 6 and API 18 read "Sub Account not found". Every other account returned 200 on
every call. API 21–34 are not in the sheet at all — the engine is documented as 23 accounts, so
anything those hold is missing from this page.
By sub-account — the account that sent the FIRST message
| Sub-account | People | Replied ≤14d | Sent a photo ≤14d | 6AB | N1N | CMN | 5AB | R | 4AB | Any code |
|---|
| API 35 |
21,217 |
4,624 21.8% |
99 0.5% |
201 0.9% | 99 0.5% | 107 0.5% | 1,021 4.8% | 152 0.7% | 61 0.3% |
1,546 7.3% |
| API 37 |
20,251 |
4,965 24.5% |
98 0.5% |
299 1.5% | 118 0.6% | 104 0.5% | 1,009 5.0% | 119 0.6% | 76 0.4% |
1,623 8.0% |
| API 36 |
19,605 |
4,772 24.3% |
63 0.3% |
248 1.3% | 88 0.4% | 111 0.6% | 884 4.5% | 133 0.7% | 84 0.4% |
1,453 7.4% |
| API 12 |
16,660 |
6,227 37.4% |
377 2.3% |
2,165 13.0% | 238 1.4% | 231 1.4% | 5 0.0% | 157 0.9% | 124 0.7% |
2,742 16.5% |
| API 3 |
13,728 |
7,049 51.3% |
358 2.6% |
2,325 16.9% | 169 1.2% | 372 2.7% | 5 0.0% | 23 0.2% | 191 1.4% |
2,955 21.5% |
| API 13 |
13,660 |
6,167 45.1% |
300 2.2% |
2,228 16.3% | 198 1.4% | 399 2.9% | 9 0.1% | 98 0.7% | 103 0.8% |
2,859 20.9% |
| API 15 |
13,659 |
5,117 37.5% |
344 2.5% |
1,675 12.3% | 226 1.7% | 323 2.4% | 5 0.0% | 39 0.3% | 52 0.4% |
2,200 16.1% |
| API 7 |
13,578 |
6,469 47.6% |
355 2.6% |
2,306 17.0% | 171 1.3% | 237 1.7% | 13 0.1% | 57 0.4% | 88 0.6% |
2,765 20.4% |
| API 14 |
13,524 |
5,511 40.7% |
252 1.9% |
1,905 14.1% | 195 1.4% | 270 2.0% | 8 0.1% | 52 0.4% | 63 0.5% |
2,387 17.7% |
| API 10 |
13,210 |
5,997 45.4% |
353 2.7% |
1,827 13.8% | 168 1.3% | 284 2.1% | 6 0.0% | 59 0.4% | 81 0.6% |
2,342 17.7% |
| API 4 |
12,626 |
6,279 49.7% |
352 2.8% |
2,017 16.0% | 170 1.3% | 351 2.8% | 8 0.1% | 16 0.1% | 86 0.7% |
2,553 20.2% |
| API 2 |
11,899 |
5,014 42.1% |
320 2.7% |
1,096 9.2% | 190 1.6% | 192 1.6% | 5 0.0% | 41 0.3% | 111 0.9% |
1,556 13.1% |
| API 8 |
11,324 |
5,001 44.2% |
316 2.8% |
1,778 15.7% | 177 1.6% | 203 1.8% | 5 0.0% | 39 0.3% | 59 0.5% |
2,177 19.2% |
| API 16 |
11,320 |
4,621 40.8% |
323 2.9% |
1,439 12.7% | 173 1.5% | 288 2.5% | — | 49 0.4% | 48 0.4% |
1,925 17.0% |
| API 19 |
10,933 |
4,100 37.5% |
324 3.0% |
1,414 12.9% | 168 1.5% | 269 2.5% | 1 0.0% | 35 0.3% | 53 0.5% |
1,880 17.2% |
| API 5 |
10,890 |
4,321 39.7% |
386 3.5% |
1,499 13.8% | 185 1.7% | 241 2.2% | 2 0.0% | 14 0.1% | 106 1.0% |
1,977 18.2% |
| API 9 |
10,648 |
4,343 40.8% |
363 3.4% |
1,428 13.4% | 195 1.8% | 253 2.4% | — | 18 0.2% | 73 0.7% |
1,884 17.7% |
| API 11 |
10,643 |
3,971 37.3% |
330 3.1% |
1,307 12.3% | 161 1.5% | 248 2.3% | 2 0.0% | 38 0.4% | 48 0.5% |
1,733 16.3% |
| API 20 |
10,035 |
3,557 35.4% |
315 3.1% |
1,105 11.0% | 165 1.6% | 222 2.2% | 1 0.0% | 33 0.3% | 41 0.4% |
1,506 15.0% |
| API 17 |
9,179 |
3,201 34.9% |
312 3.4% |
1,018 11.1% | 166 1.8% | 219 2.4% | 3 0.0% | 58 0.6% | 45 0.5% |
1,433 15.6% |
A person messaged by several accounts is counted once, against whichever sent their earliest message.
API 35, 36 and 37 are the kids accounts — they run the child templates, carry sle:segment:kids, and
are the only ones producing 5AB at volume.
By city
| City | People | Replied ≤14d | Sent a photo ≤14d | 6AB | N1N | CMN | 5AB | R | 4AB | Any code |
|---|
| not tagged |
87,517 |
55,451 63.4% |
1,243 1.4% |
17,366 19.8% | 533 0.6% | 2,612 3.0% | 1,290 1.5% | 415 0.5% | 861 1.0% |
22,326 25.5% |
| new york |
41,321 |
13,264 32.1% |
927 2.2% |
4,297 10.4% | 483 1.2% | 605 1.5% | 430 1.0% | 101 0.2% | 256 0.6% |
5,915 14.3% |
| florida |
31,184 |
6,788 21.8% |
725 2.3% |
1,361 4.4% | 444 1.4% | 229 0.7% | 280 0.9% | 171 0.5% | 130 0.4% |
2,429 7.8% |
| houston |
24,643 |
7,153 29.0% |
571 2.3% |
2,137 8.7% | 304 1.2% | 287 1.2% | 301 1.2% | 92 0.4% | 88 0.4% |
3,047 12.4% |
| chicago |
22,312 |
3,353 15.0% |
582 2.6% |
334 1.5% | 486 2.2% | 310 1.4% | 56 0.3% | 93 0.4% | 2 0.0% |
1,105 5.0% |
| dallas |
20,643 |
4,003 19.4% |
837 4.1% |
561 2.7% | 431 2.1% | 139 0.7% | 245 1.2% | 64 0.3% | 57 0.3% |
1,419 6.9% |
| boston |
18,601 |
4,974 26.7% |
394 2.1% |
1,410 7.6% | 292 1.6% | 275 1.5% | 182 1.0% | 74 0.4% | 72 0.4% |
2,198 11.8% |
| nashville |
16,350 |
4,985 30.5% |
484 3.0% |
1,628 10.0% | 288 1.8% | 277 1.7% | 200 1.2% | 48 0.3% | 127 0.8% |
2,445 15.0% |
| orlando |
6,018 |
1,335 22.2% |
177 2.9% |
186 3.1% | 159 2.6% | 190 3.2% | 8 0.1% | 172 2.9% | — |
612 10.2% |
"not tagged" is the pre-SLE population — contacts from the 2025 automation that carry a
crm_id but none of the sle: enrichment tags. They were being worked when the leads were days
old, which is why their reply rate is so far above everything else. They are not a city.
By the supplier whose code the engine was handed
| Supplier of the original code | People | Replied ≤14d | Sent a photo ≤14d | 6AB | N1N | CMN | 5AB | R | 4AB | Any code |
|---|
| Alan |
144,533 |
64,636 44.7% |
2,958 2.0% |
20,906 14.5% | 1,740 1.2% | 3,036 2.1% | 1,767 1.2% | 319 0.2% | 1,247 0.9% |
27,834 19.3% |
| Blue Rooms |
34,664 |
7,487 21.6% |
91 0.3% |
978 2.8% | 293 0.8% | 473 1.4% | 303 0.9% | 445 1.3% | 6 0.0% |
2,254 6.5% |
| no source code |
32,118 |
6,099 19.0% |
781 2.4% |
522 1.6% | 331 1.0% | 230 0.7% | 1 0.0% | 303 0.9% | 3 0.0% |
1,312 4.1% |
| In-house recycled |
26,677 |
11,589 43.4% |
1,394 5.2% |
3,630 13.6% | 508 1.9% | 520 1.9% | 524 2.0% | 32 0.1% | 172 0.6% |
5,203 19.5% |
| Lead Pronto |
18,787 |
8,568 45.6% |
362 1.9% |
2,472 13.2% | 280 1.5% | 508 2.7% | 305 1.6% | 102 0.5% | 148 0.8% |
3,624 19.3% |
| Boost |
11,491 |
2,809 24.4% |
344 3.0% |
745 6.5% | 262 2.3% | 154 1.3% | 83 0.7% | 29 0.3% | 12 0.1% |
1,224 10.7% |
| Organic |
319 |
118 37.0% |
10 3.1% |
27 8.5% | 6 1.9% | 3 0.9% | 9 2.8% | — | 5 1.6% |
45 14.1% |
Read off sle:source:<code> with the recycled -R stripped before classifying —
classify() finds Blue Rooms with endsWith('X') and a recycled code ends in R, so without the
strip every recycled Blue Rooms code bills to Alan.
Every first message the engine has sent, by volume
| First message | Ask | People | Share |
|---|
| Hi NAME, USA Models here. We got your photo a little while back and think you have a good look. Are you still interested in becoming a model? |
YES ask — adult |
102,442 |
38.1% |
| Hi NAME, You applied to model with us a little while ago and we'd love to take another look. Could you send over a recent photo of yourself? We'll get one of the team to |
PHOTO ask — adult |
80,203 |
29.9% |
| Hi NAME, it’s Emily from USA Models. We got your photo a little while back and think you have a good look. Are you still interested in becoming a model? |
YES ask — adult |
44,710 |
16.6% |
| Hi NAME, We recently tried to get in touch about your child's modelling application. We're picking things back up and wanted to check you're still interested? Just reply |
YES ask — child |
15,972 |
5.9% |
| Hi NAME, We recently tried to reach you about your child's modelling application - we don't want them to miss out. Reply YES and let us know if you'd still like to move f |
YES ask — child |
9,038 |
3.4% |
| Hi NAME, You got in touch about modelling for your child and we are reviewing applications again. If you are still interested, please send us a recent photo. A clear, nat |
PHOTO ask — child |
7,718 |
2.9% |
| To the parent of NAME, We recently tried to get in touch about your child's modelling application. We're picking things back up and wanted to check you're still intereste |
YES ask — child |
3,423 |
1.3% |
| To the parent of NAME, We recently tried to reach you about your child's modelling application - we don't want them to miss out. Reply YES and let us know if you'd still |
YES ask — child |
1,992 |
0.7% |
| Hi NAME, it's Emily from USA Models. You filled out a form recently about coming on a photo shoot and becoming a model. Still interested? |
YES ask — adult |
1,315 |
0.5% |
| Hi NAME, We recently reached out about your child's modelling application and didn't hear back. Spots are opening up and we'd love to include them. Are you still keen? Ju |
other / one-off |
746 |
0.3% |
| Hi NAME, it's Emily from USA Models. We got your photo a little while back and think you have a good look. Are you still interested in becoming a model? |
YES ask — adult |
441 |
0.2% |
| Hi NAME, USA Models here. We got your photo a little while back and think you have a good look. Are you still interested in becoming a model? Reply |
YES ask — adult |
315 |
0.1% |
| Hi NAME, Its Emily from USA Models. We love the photo you sent in. Are you still interested in becoming a model? |
YES ask — adult |
122 |
0.0% |
| 54 further one-off variants (broken merge fields, truncated sends, manual replies) | mixed | 151 | 0.1% |
Names and the unsubscribe/signature tail are stripped, so the per-account "Thanks, USA Models API 12"
variants collapse into one row. 28,355 conversations hold no outbound SMS at all, and
34 of 356,227 message fetches errored.