Share:

Lead Quality Report

09/12/2026 → 09/19/2026  ·  7 days  ·  10,549 leads in  ·  OOA: >200mi
All20.9%
Atlanta73.3%
Dallas21.7%
Nashville19.9%
Houston19.5%
Chicago18.9%
Florida17.5%
New York16.9%
Boston16.7%
By Supplier
Blue Rooms21.5%
Neil Recycled20.7%
Lead Pronto24.0%
Alan15.0%
Organic37.0%
Leads In
10,549
Usable
8,349
79.1%
Non-Usable
2,200
20.9%
OOA
751
Booked
477
Gross: 4.5%
Net Book Rate
5.7%
booked / usable
Fresh Leads FB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc.
In
7,911
Good
6,177
Bad
1,734
Good %
78.1%
399 booked · Net: 6.5%
Alan (4AB) 4AB codes only
In
2
Good
1
Bad
1
Good %
50.0%
0 booked · Net: 0.0%
Neil Recycled 5AB, 6AB, CMN, NIN, N1N codes
In
2,080
Good
1,650
Bad
430
Good %
79.3%
45 booked · Net: 2.7%
Retargeted (R) codes ending in R
In
556
Good
521
Bad
35
Good %
93.7%
31 booked · Net: 6.0%
All Cities — By Source
SourceInRejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BadUsableBad %BookedNet Book %
Organic 81 11 13.6% 16 19.8% 2 2.5% 9 11.1% 5 6 7.4% 30 51 37.0% 3 5.9%
Lead Pronto 1,739 55 3.2% 323 18.6% 16 0.9% 165 9.5% 142 48 2.8% 417 1,322 24.0% 68 5.1%
Blue Rooms 4,983 69 1.4% 597 12.0% 199 4.0% 171 3.4% 227 439 8.8% 1,073 3,910 21.5% 266 6.8%
Neil Recycled 2,080 39 1.9% 200 9.6% 14 0.7% 48 2.3% 138 218 10.5% 430 1,650 20.7% 45 2.7%
Alan 1,666 48 2.9% 171 10.3% 5 0.3% 103 6.2% 63 40 2.4% 250 1,416 15.0% 93 6.6%
All Cities — Material Issues (reasons that hit >3% of a supplier's leads — 8 flagged)
Supplier Supplier Leads Type Reason Count % of Supplier Leads
Organic 81 Removal Duplicate 9 11.1%
Lead Pronto 1,739 Removal Duplicate 165 9.5%
Organic 81 Rejection DUPLICATE Lead 7 8.6%
Alan 1,666 Removal Duplicate 103 6.2%
Blue Rooms 4,983 Removal Blocked 199 4.0%
Organic 81 Removal Previous Client 3 3.7%
Blue Rooms 4,983 Removal Duplicate 171 3.4%
Lead Pronto 1,739 Removal Inappropriate 57 3.3%
All Cities — Top 5 Rejection Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Rejected#1#2#3#4#5
Blue Rooms 69
DO NOT CALL
28 · 41%
Wrong Number
16 · 23%
DUPLICATE Lead
15 · 22%
Out Of State
5 · 7%
Unemployed Undocumented
3 · 4%
Lead Pronto 55
DO NOT CALL
21 · 38%
Wrong Number
15 · 27%
DUPLICATE Lead
14 · 25%
Been to Us Already
3 · 5%
Out Of State
2 · 4%
Alan 48
DUPLICATE Lead
14 · 29%
Wrong Number
10 · 21%
Been to Us Already
8 · 17%
DO NOT CALL
7 · 15%
Out Of State
6 · 13%
Neil Recycled 39
DO NOT CALL
17 · 44%
DUPLICATE Lead
12 · 31%
Out Of State
4 · 10%
Wrong Number
3 · 8%
Too Young
1 · 3%
Organic 11
DUPLICATE Lead
7 · 64%
Too Young
1 · 9%
Wrong Number
1 · 9%
Been to Us Already
1 · 9%
Out Of State
1 · 9%
All Cities — Top 5 Removal Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Removed#1#2#3#4#5
Blue Rooms 597
Blocked
199 · 33%
Duplicate
171 · 29%
Pro portfolio
101 · 17%
Inappropriate
54 · 9%
Previous Client
52 · 9%
Lead Pronto 323
Duplicate
165 · 51%
Inappropriate
57 · 18%
Pro portfolio
44 · 14%
Too young/old
28 · 9%
Blocked
16 · 5%
Neil Recycled 200
Duplicate
48 · 24%
Inappropriate
44 · 22%
No Photo
25 · 13%
Previous Client
25 · 13%
Pro portfolio
25 · 13%
Alan 171
Duplicate
103 · 60%
Pro portfolio
27 · 16%
Inappropriate
18 · 11%
Previous Client
12 · 7%
Blocked
5 · 3%
Organic 16
Duplicate
9 · 56%
Previous Client
3 · 19%
Blocked
2 · 13%
Inappropriate
1 · 6%
Pro portfolio
1 · 6%
All Cities — Fresh Leads Focus
Fresh LeadsFB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc. 7,911 leads · 1,734 bad · 21.9% · 399 booked · Net: 6.5%
Atlanta 442 in · 324 bad · 73.3% · 0 booked · Net: 0.0%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#AT1FX 147 35 112 23.8% 1 0.7% 16 10.9% 8 5.4% 8 106 72.1%
#ATKIDSX 295 83 212 28.1% 10 3.4% 10 207 70.2%
TOTAL 442 118 324 26.7% 1 0.2% 26 5.9% 8 1.8% 0 18 313 70.8% 0
Dallas 1,071 in · 244 bad · 22.8% · 60 booked · Net: 7.3%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#DALKIDS 1 0 1 0.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0%
#DALFB33F 1 0 1 0.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0%
#DAL3CX2F 3 1 2 33.3% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 1
#DALP2 161 95 66 59.0% 12 7.5% 48 29.8% 3 1.9% 21 13.0% 24 7 4.3% 7 7.4%
#DAL3CX3F 5 3 2 60.0% 1 20.0% 1 1 20.0%
#DALFB32F 6 4 2 66.7% 2 33.3% 1 16.7% 1
#DAL1FX 301 207 94 68.8% 15 5.0% 66 21.9% 25 8.3% 26 8.6% 15 15 5.0% 16 7.7%
#DALFB31F 8 6 2 75.0% 2 25.0% 2 25.0%
#DALFB31M 57 43 14 75.4% 4 7.0% 10 17.5% 9 15.8% 1 7 16.3%
#DAL3CX2M 5 4 1 80.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0%
#DAL3CX1M 64 52 12 81.3% 4 6.3% 4 6.3% 1 1.6% 3 4 6.3% 5 9.6%
#DAL3CX1F 103 85 18 82.5% 7 6.8% 11 10.7% 4 3.9% 7 2 1.9% 1 1.2%
#DALFB32M 19 17 2 89.5% 2 10.5% 2 10.5%
#DALKIDSX 286 260 26 90.9% 10 3.5% 8 2.8% 3 1.0% 5 9 3.1% 18 6.9%
#DALSNAP 46 45 1 97.8% 1 2.2% 1 2.2% 6 13.3%
#DALGX 5 5 0 100.0%
TOTAL 1,071 827 244 77.2% 53 4.9% 159 14.8% 32 3.0% 69 6.4% 58 39 3.6% 60 7.3%
Houston 983 in · 188 bad · 19.1% · 53 booked · Net: 6.7%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#HOU3DE1M 1 0 1 0.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0%
#HOU3CX2M 2 1 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 1
#HOU1FX 173 104 69 60.1% 2 1.2% 61 35.3% 22 12.7% 14 8.1% 25 9 5.2% 9 8.7%
#HOU3CX1M 31 23 8 74.2% 1 3.2% 4 12.9% 1 3.2% 2 6.5% 1 4 12.9% 3 13.0%
#HOULP2 226 175 51 77.4% 6 2.7% 41 18.1% 3 1.3% 20 8.8% 18 5 2.2% 9 5.1%
#HOUFB31F 35 28 7 80.0% 2 5.7% 3 8.6% 2 5.7% 1 2 5.7%
#HOUGX 5 4 1 80.0% 1 20.0%
#HOU3CX1F 48 41 7 85.4% 1 2.1% 4 8.3% 4 2 4.2% 5 12.2%
#HOUFB31M 91 78 13 85.7% 4 4.4% 7 7.7% 4 4.4% 3 2 2.2% 7 9.0%
#HOUFB32M 10 9 1 90.0% 1 10.0% 1 10.0%
#HOUKIDSX 334 305 29 91.3% 5 1.5% 13 3.9% 1 0.3% 5 1.5% 7 11 3.3% 17 5.6%
#HOUSNAP 13 13 0 100.0% 2 15.4%
#HOUFB32F 11 11 0 100.0% 1 9.1%
#HOUFB33M 1 1 0 100.0%
#HOU3CX2F 1 1 0 100.0%
#HOUFB33F 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 983 795 188 80.9% 24 2.4% 135 13.7% 27 2.7% 48 4.9% 60 36 3.7% 53 6.7%
Boston 840 in · 156 bad · 18.6% · 35 booked · Net: 5.1%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#BO3CX3F 3 2 1 66.7% 1 33.3%
#BOFB32F 7 5 2 71.4% 2 28.6% 1 14.3% 1 14.3%
#BOFB31F 11 8 3 72.7% 3 27.3% 2 18.2% 1
#BOFB31M 19 14 5 73.7% 2 10.5% 3 15.8% 2 10.5% 1 1 7.1%
#BOSLP2 222 164 58 73.9% 15 6.8% 43 19.4% 4 1.8% 20 9.0% 19 8 4.9%
#BOS1FX 295 228 67 77.3% 5 1.7% 62 21.0% 24 8.1% 19 6.4% 19 10 4.4%
#BO3CX1F 38 30 8 78.9% 8 21.1% 1 2.6% 3 7.9% 4 2 6.7%
#BOSSNAP 30 26 4 86.7% 1 3.3% 3 10.0% 1 3.3% 2
#BO3CX1M 31 29 2 93.5% 2 6.5% 1 3.2% 1 2 6.9%
#BOSKIDSX 177 171 6 96.6% 1 0.6% 5 2.8% 2 1.1% 3 12 7.0%
#BO3CX3M 1 1 0 100.0%
#BOFB32M 3 3 0 100.0%
#BO3CX2F 1 1 0 100.0%
#BOSGX 2 2 0 100.0%
TOTAL 840 684 156 81.4% 25 3.0% 131 15.6% 31 3.7% 50 6.0% 50 0 35 5.1%
Chicago 944 in · 175 bad · 18.5% · 42 booked · Net: 5.5%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#CHI3CX3F 1 0 1 0.0% 1 100.0% 1
#CHI1FX 212 132 80 62.3% 1 0.5% 65 30.7% 23 10.8% 22 10.4% 20 16 7.5% 3 2.3%
#CHIFB31M 63 50 13 79.4% 3 4.8% 10 15.9% 9 14.3% 1 6 12.0%
#CHILP2 234 190 44 81.2% 4 1.7% 40 17.1% 28 12.0% 12 18 9.5%
#CHIFB31F 22 19 3 86.4% 1 4.5% 2 9.1% 1 4.5% 1
#CHI3CX1F 30 26 4 86.7% 3 10.0% 1 3.3% 2 1 3.3% 1 3.8%
#CHIFB32M 9 8 1 88.9% 1 11.1% 1 11.1% 1 12.5%
#CHIKIDSX 296 271 25 91.6% 1 0.3% 5 1.7% 2 0.7% 3 20 6.8% 6 2.2%
#CHISNAP 36 33 3 91.7% 3 8.3% 2 5.6% 1 2 6.1%
#CHI3CX1M 19 18 1 94.7% 1 5.3% 2 11.1%
#CHIFB32F 7 7 0 100.0% 2 28.6%
#CHI3CX3M 2 2 0 100.0% 1 50.0%
#CHI3CX2M 2 2 0 100.0%
#CHI3CX2F 2 2 0 100.0%
#CHIFB33F 1 1 0 100.0%
#CHIGX 7 7 0 100.0%
#CHIFB33M 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 944 769 175 81.5% 10 1.1% 130 13.8% 25 2.6% 64 6.8% 41 38 4.0% 42 5.5%
Florida 2,247 in · 413 bad · 18.4% · 84 booked · Net: 4.6%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#FL3CX3F 4 2 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 1
#FL3CX2F 4 2 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0%
#FL01 81 51 30 63.0% 11 13.6% 16 19.8% 2 2.5% 9 11.1% 5 6 7.4% 3 5.9%
#FLFB31F 28 18 10 64.3% 10 35.7% 7 25.0% 3
#ORLP2 353 266 87 75.4% 3 0.8% 63 17.8% 28 7.9% 35 25 7.1% 9 3.4%
#FL1FX 301 228 73 75.7% 1 0.3% 72 23.9% 30 10.0% 22 7.3% 20 16 7.0%
#FLP2 205 158 47 77.1% 3 1.5% 44 21.5% 3 1.5% 25 12.2% 16 1 0.5% 6 3.8%
#ORL1FX 327 257 70 78.6% 3 0.9% 64 19.6% 21 6.4% 28 8.6% 15 3 0.9% 15 5.8%
#FLFB31M 71 57 14 80.3% 1 1.4% 13 18.3% 10 14.1% 3 4 7.0%
#ORLFB31M 75 61 14 81.3% 1 1.3% 11 14.7% 8 10.7% 3 2 2.7% 4 6.6%
#FL3CX1F 77 64 13 83.1% 12 15.6% 2 2.6% 6 7.8% 4 1 1.3% 2 3.1%
#FL3CX1M 46 40 6 87.0% 5 10.9% 2 4.3% 3 1 2.2% 2 5.0%
#ORLFB32F 8 7 1 87.5% 1 12.5%
#FLSNAP 8 7 1 87.5% 1 12.5% 1 12.5% 1 14.3%
#ORLSNAP 25 22 3 88.0% 2 8.0% 1 4.0% 1 1 4.5%
#FLFB32F 9 8 1 88.9% 1 11.1% 1 11.1%
#FLKIDSX 593 555 38 93.6% 4 0.7% 28 4.7% 5 0.8% 5 0.8% 18 7 1.2% 20 3.6%
#ORLFB31F 22 21 1 95.5% 1 4.5% 1 4.5% 1 4.8%
#FLGX 6 6 0 100.0%
#FL3CX2M 1 1 0 100.0%
#ORLGX 3 3 0 100.0%
TOTAL 2,247 1,834 413 81.6% 31 1.4% 344 15.3% 64 2.8% 153 6.8% 127 47 2.1% 84 4.6%
Nashville 574 in · 102 bad · 17.8% · 50 booked · Net: 10.6%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#NAFB31F 5 3 2 60.0% 2 40.0% 2 40.0%
#NAFB32F 5 3 2 60.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0%
#NA3CX1F 24 16 8 66.7% 1 4.2% 7 29.2% 4 16.7% 3 1 4.2% 1 6.3%
#NA1FX 164 122 42 74.4% 3 1.8% 38 23.2% 8 4.9% 8 4.9% 22 3 1.8% 12 9.8%
#NA3CX2F 4 3 1 75.0% 1 25.0%
#NALP2 106 83 23 78.3% 3 2.8% 14 13.2% 9 8.5% 5 7 6.6% 4 4.8%
#NA3CX1M 12 10 2 83.3% 1 8.3% 1 8.3% 1 8.3% 1 10.0%
#NAKIDSX 191 171 20 89.5% 8 4.2% 1 0.5% 3 1.6% 4 12 6.3% 27 15.8%
#NAFB31M 25 23 2 92.0% 1 4.0% 1 4.0% 1 1 4.0% 1 4.3%
#NASSNAP 24 24 0 100.0% 2 8.3%
#NAFB32M 12 12 0 100.0% 2 16.7%
#NA3CX3F 1 1 0 100.0%
#NASGX 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 574 472 102 82.2% 10 1.7% 72 12.5% 9 1.6% 28 4.9% 35 25 4.4% 50 10.6%
New York 810 in · 132 bad · 16.3% · 75 booked · Net: 11.1%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#NY3CX1F 3 2 1 66.7% 1 33.3% 1
#NY3CX1M 3 2 1 66.7% 1 33.3%
#NY1FX 232 164 68 70.7% 6 2.6% 57 24.6% 22 9.5% 13 5.6% 22 8 3.4% 14 8.5%
#NYLP2 156 123 33 78.8% 6 3.8% 27 17.3% 3 1.9% 14 9.0% 10 5 4.1%
#NYSNAP 14 13 1 92.9% 1 7.1% 1 7.1%
#NYKIDSX 396 368 28 92.9% 7 1.8% 9 2.3% 2 0.5% 7 13 3.3% 56 15.2%
#NYFB32M 2 2 0 100.0%
#NYFB31M 2 2 0 100.0%
#NY3CX2M 1 1 0 100.0%
#NY3CX2F 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 810 678 132 83.7% 19 2.3% 95 11.7% 26 3.2% 29 3.6% 40 22 2.7% 75 11.1%
Alan (4AB)4AB codes only 2 leads · 1 bad · 50.0% · 0 booked · Net: 0.0%
Dallas 1 in · 1 bad · 100.0% · 0 booked · Net: 0.0%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#DAL4AB 1 0 1 0.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0%
TOTAL 1 0 1 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% 0
Nashville 1 in · 0 bad · 0.0% · 0 booked · Net: 0.0%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#NA4ABR 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 1 1 0 100.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Neil Recycled5AB, 6AB, CMN, NIN, N1N codes 2,080 leads · 430 bad · 20.7% · 45 booked · Net: 2.7%
Nashville 212 in · 60 bad · 28.3% · 4 booked · Net: 2.6%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#NAN1N 47 30 17 63.8% 2 4.3% 6 12.8% 6 13 27.7%
#NA6AB 128 90 38 70.3% 2 1.6% 12 9.4% 2 1.6% 1 0.8% 9 26 20.3% 2 2.2%
#NACMN 14 12 2 85.7% 2 14.3% 1 8.3%
#NA5AB 23 20 3 87.0% 1 4.3% 1 2 8.7% 1 5.0%
TOTAL 212 152 60 71.7% 4 1.9% 19 9.0% 2 0.9% 1 0.5% 16 43 20.3% 4 2.6%
Chicago 291 in · 66 bad · 22.7% · 6 booked · Net: 2.7%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#CHI6AB 168 124 44 73.8% 1 0.6% 27 16.1% 9 5.4% 18 18 10.7% 2 1.6%
#CHICMN 24 19 5 79.2% 2 8.3% 1 4.2% 1 3 12.5% 3 15.8%
#CHIN1N 71 57 14 80.3% 6 8.5% 2 2.8% 1 1.4% 3 8 11.3% 1 1.8%
#CHI5AB 28 25 3 89.3% 2 7.1% 1 3.6% 1 1 3.6%
TOTAL 291 225 66 77.3% 1 0.3% 37 12.7% 2 0.7% 12 4.1% 23 30 10.3% 6 2.7%
Houston 308 in · 66 bad · 21.4% · 6 booked · Net: 2.5%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#HOU6AB 172 130 42 75.6% 3 1.7% 19 11.0% 1 0.6% 4 2.3% 14 23 13.4% 3 2.3%
#HOU5AB 43 34 9 79.1% 1 2.3% 5 11.6% 2 4.7% 3 3 7.0% 1 2.9%
#HOUN1N 66 54 12 81.8% 6 9.1% 2 3.0% 4 7 10.6% 1 1.9%
#HOUCMN 27 24 3 88.9% 1 3.7% 3 11.1% 1 4.2%
TOTAL 308 242 66 78.6% 5 1.6% 30 9.7% 1 0.3% 8 2.6% 21 36 11.7% 6 2.5%
Dallas 230 in · 49 bad · 21.3% · 5 booked · Net: 2.8%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#DAL6AB 133 95 38 71.4% 1 0.8% 24 18.0% 2 1.5% 3 2.3% 19 15 11.3% 1 1.1%
#DALN1N 65 56 9 86.2% 5 7.7% 1 1.5% 4 4 6.2% 1 1.8%
#DALCMN 12 11 1 91.7% 1 8.3%
#DAL5AB 20 19 1 95.0% 1 5.0% 3 15.8%
TOTAL 230 181 49 78.7% 1 0.4% 29 12.6% 2 0.9% 4 1.7% 23 21 9.1% 5 2.8%
New York 393 in · 81 bad · 20.6% · 13 booked · Net: 4.2%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#NYN1N 82 64 18 78.0% 1 1.2% 9 11.0% 1 1.2% 1 1.2% 7 12 14.6% 5 7.8%
#NY6AB 218 171 47 78.4% 1 0.5% 21 9.6% 2 0.9% 10 4.6% 9 29 13.3% 1 0.6%
#NYCMN 42 33 9 78.6% 4 9.5% 6 14.3% 2 6.1%
#NY5AB 51 44 7 86.3% 4 7.8% 1 2.0% 3 3 5.9% 5 11.4%
TOTAL 393 312 81 79.4% 6 1.5% 34 8.7% 3 0.8% 12 3.1% 19 50 12.7% 13 4.2%
Florida 440 in · 82 bad · 18.6% · 8 booked · Net: 2.2%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#ORLCMN 11 8 3 72.7% 2 18.2% 1 9.1%
#FLN1N 55 42 13 76.4% 5 9.1% 8 14.5% 1 1.8% 2 3.6% 5 1 1.8% 2 4.8%
#FL6AB 158 125 33 79.1% 6 3.8% 18 11.4% 1 0.6% 3 1.9% 14 9 5.7%
#ORL5AB 10 8 2 80.0% 1 10.0% 1 1 10.0%
#ORL6AB 89 72 17 80.9% 9 10.1% 2 2.2% 2 2.2% 5 9 10.1% 4 5.6%
#ORLN1N 57 47 10 82.5% 1 1.8% 5 8.8% 2 3.5% 3 5 8.8%
#FL5AB 39 36 3 92.3% 2 5.1% 1 2.6%
#FLCMN 21 20 1 95.2% 1 4.8% 2 10.0%
TOTAL 440 358 82 81.4% 17 3.9% 41 9.3% 4 0.9% 9 2.0% 28 27 6.1% 8 2.2%
Boston 206 in · 26 bad · 12.6% · 3 booked · Net: 1.7%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#BOS5AB 13 8 5 61.5% 1 7.7% 2 15.4% 2 2 15.4%
#BOSCMN 14 10 4 71.4% 4 28.6%
#BOSN1N 55 49 6 89.1% 4 7.3% 1 1.8% 3 2 3.6% 1 2.0%
#BOS6AB 124 113 11 91.1% 4 3.2% 1 0.8% 3 7 5.6% 2 1.8%
TOTAL 206 180 26 87.4% 5 2.4% 10 4.9% 0 2 1.0% 8 11 5.3% 3 1.7%
Retargeted (R)codes ending in R 556 leads · 35 bad · 6.3% · 31 booked · Net: 6.0%
Houston 55 in · 8 bad · 14.5% · 0 booked · Net: 0.0%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#HOUGXR 2 1 1 50.0% 1 50.0%
#HOUFB32FR 2 1 1 50.0% 1 50.0%
#HOUFB32MR 3 2 1 66.7% 1 33.3%
#HOU3CX1FR 3 2 1 66.7% 1 33.3%
#HOULP2R 12 9 3 75.0% 2 16.7% 1 8.3% 1 1 8.3%
#HOU1FXR 15 14 1 93.3% 1 6.7%
#HOUPXR 1 1 0 100.0%
#HOUSNAPR 4 4 0 100.0%
#HOUKXR 1 1 0 100.0%
#HOUFB31MR 4 4 0 100.0%
#HOUFB31FR 2 2 0 100.0%
#HOUKIDSXR 3 3 0 100.0%
#HOU3CX2MR 1 1 0 100.0%
#HOUFB33FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#HOU3CX1MR 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 55 47 8 85.5% 3 5.5% 1 1.8% 0 0 1 5 9.1% 0
Nashville 58 in · 6 bad · 10.3% · 5 booked · Net: 9.6%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#NADXR 3 2 1 66.7% 1 33.3% 1
#NA3CX1MR 3 2 1 66.7% 1 33.3%
#NALP2R 16 13 3 81.3% 1 6.3% 1 6.3% 1 1 6.3% 1 7.7%
#NA1FXR 12 11 1 91.7% 1 8.3% 1 2 18.2%
#NAFB32MR 3 3 0 100.0%
#NASSNAPR 2 2 0 100.0%
#NASGXR 4 4 0 100.0%
#NAKIDSXR 5 5 0 100.0% 2 40.0%
#NA3CX1FR 3 3 0 100.0%
#NAFB33FR 2 2 0 100.0%
#NAFB32FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#NAFB31MR 1 1 0 100.0%
#NAFB33MR 2 2 0 100.0%
#NAFB31FR 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 58 52 6 89.7% 1 1.7% 3 5.2% 0 0 3 2 3.4% 5 9.6%
Chicago 68 in · 5 bad · 7.4% · 2 booked · Net: 3.2%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#CHIKIDSXR 16 13 3 81.3% 2 12.5% 1 6.3%
#CHI1FXR 30 28 2 93.3% 1 3.3% 1 1 3.3% 2 7.1%
#CHISNAPR 9 9 0 100.0%
#CHIFB31MR 3 3 0 100.0%
#CHIFB32MR 2 2 0 100.0%
#CHIFB33FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#CHI3CX1MR 1 1 0 100.0%
#CHIDXR 3 3 0 100.0%
#CHIGXR 2 2 0 100.0%
#CHI3CX1FR 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 68 63 5 92.6% 2 2.9% 1 1.5% 0 0 1 2 2.9% 2 3.2%
Dallas 70 in · 4 bad · 5.7% · 8 booked · Net: 12.1%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#DALFB31FR 3 2 1 66.7% 1 33.3% 1 33.3%
#DAL1FXR 15 13 2 86.7% 1 6.7% 1 6.7% 1 6.7% 1 7.7%
#DALKIDSXR 22 21 1 95.5% 1 4.5% 1 4 19.0%
#DALFB32FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#DALGXR 4 4 0 100.0% 1 25.0%
#DALDXR 1 1 0 100.0%
#DALSNAPR 5 5 0 100.0%
#DAL3CX2FR 2 2 0 100.0%
#DALFB31MR 2 2 0 100.0%
#DALP2R 7 7 0 100.0%
#DAL3CX1FR 5 5 0 100.0% 1 20.0%
#DAL3CX1MR 1 1 0 100.0% 1 100.0%
#DALFB32MR 2 2 0 100.0%
TOTAL 70 66 4 94.3% 0 3 4.3% 0 2 2.9% 1 1 1.4% 8 12.1%
Florida 183 in · 8 bad · 4.4% · 10 booked · Net: 5.7%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#FLGXR 1 0 1 0.0% 1 100.0%
#FLFB31FR 2 1 1 50.0% 1 50.0%
#ORLP2R 19 17 2 89.5% 1 5.3% 1 1 5.3% 1 5.9%
#FLFB31MR 11 10 1 90.9% 1 9.1% 1 10.0%
#ORLFB31MR 15 14 1 93.3% 1 6.7%
#ORL1FXR 30 29 1 96.7% 1 3.3% 1 3.3% 2 6.9%
#FLKIDSXR 36 35 1 97.2% 1 2.8% 1 2.8% 3 8.6%
#FLSNAPR 2 2 0 100.0%
#FL1FXR 39 39 0 100.0% 3 7.7%
#FLDXR 3 3 0 100.0%
#ORLGXR 4 4 0 100.0%
#ORL4IG31MR 1 1 0 100.0%
#ORLDXR 3 3 0 100.0%
#FL01R 2 2 0 100.0%
#FL3CX3FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#ORLSNAPR 2 2 0 100.0%
#FL3CX1FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#FL4IG32FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#FL3CX1MR 3 3 0 100.0%
#ORL4IG31FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#ORLFB31FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#ORLFB32FR 3 3 0 100.0%
#FLFB32FR 2 2 0 100.0%
TOTAL 183 175 8 95.6% 3 1.6% 3 1.6% 0 2 1.1% 1 2 1.1% 10 5.7%
Boston 54 in · 2 bad · 3.7% · 2 booked · Net: 3.8%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#BO3CX2MR 1 0 1 0.0% 1 100.0% 1
#BO3CX1FR 3 2 1 66.7% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 1 50.0%
#BOSLP2R 12 12 0 100.0%
#BOS1FXR 22 22 0 100.0%
#BO3CX1MR 2 2 0 100.0%
#BOSKIDSXR 5 5 0 100.0% 1 20.0%
#BOSSNAPR 5 5 0 100.0%
#BOSDXR 3 3 0 100.0%
#BOSPXR 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 54 52 2 96.3% 0 2 3.7% 0 1 1.9% 1 0 2 3.8%
New York 68 in · 2 bad · 2.9% · 4 booked · Net: 6.1%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#NYKIDSXR 40 38 2 95.0% 2 5.0% 2 5.0% 2 5.3%
#NYSNAPR 9 9 0 100.0% 1 11.1%
#NY1FXR 4 4 0 100.0% 1 25.0%
#NYLP2R 10 10 0 100.0%
#NY3CX1FR 3 3 0 100.0%
#NYKPXR 1 1 0 100.0%
#NY3CX1MR 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 68 66 2 97.1% 0 2 2.9% 0 2 2.9% 0 0 4 6.1%
All Cities — Top Rejection Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
DO NOT CALL7332.9%
DUPLICATE Lead6227.9%
Wrong Number4520.3%
Out Of State188.1%
Been to Us Already146.3%
Unemployed Undocumented73.2%
Too Young20.9%
No English Spoken10.5%
All Cities — Top Removal Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
Duplicate49637.9%
Blocked23618.1%
Pro portfolio19815.1%
Inappropriate17413.3%
Previous Client1027.8%
Too young/old665.0%
No Photo251.9%
Not Suitable80.6%
Spam20.2%
City Comparison
CityInRejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BadUsableBad %BookedNet Book %
Atlanta 442 1 0.2% 26 5.9% 8 1.8% 0 0.0% 18 313 70.8% 324 118 73.3% 0
Dallas 1,372 55 4.0% 191 13.9% 34 2.5% 75 5.5% 82 62 4.5% 298 1,074 21.7% 73 6.8%
Nashville 845 15 1.8% 94 11.1% 11 1.3% 29 3.4% 54 70 8.3% 168 677 19.9% 59 8.7%
Houston 1,346 32 2.4% 166 12.3% 28 2.1% 56 4.2% 82 77 5.7% 262 1,084 19.5% 59 5.4%
Chicago 1,303 13 1.0% 168 12.9% 27 2.1% 76 5.8% 65 70 5.4% 246 1,057 18.9% 50 4.7%
Florida 2,870 51 1.8% 388 13.5% 68 2.4% 164 5.7% 156 76 2.6% 503 2,367 17.5% 102 4.3%
New York 1,271 25 2.0% 131 10.3% 29 2.3% 43 3.4% 59 72 5.7% 215 1,056 16.9% 92 8.7%
Boston 1,100 30 2.7% 143 13.0% 31 2.8% 53 4.8% 59 11 1.0% 184 916 16.7% 40 4.4%
Leads In
442
Usable
118
26.7%
Non-Usable
324
73.3%
OOA
313
Booked
0
Gross: 0.0%
Net Book Rate
0.0%
booked / usable
Fresh Leads FB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc.
In
442
Good
118
Bad
324
Good %
26.7%
0 booked · Net: 0.0%
Alan (4AB)
—
Neil Recycled
—
Retargeted (R)
—
Atlanta — By Source
SourceInRejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BadUsableBad %BookedNet Book %
Blue Rooms 442 1 0.2% 26 5.9% 8 1.8% 0 18 313 70.8% 324 118 73.3% 0
Atlanta — Top 5 Rejection Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Rejected#1#2#3#4#5
Blue Rooms 1
DUPLICATE Lead
1 · 100%
————
Atlanta — Top 5 Removal Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Removed#1#2#3#4#5
Blue Rooms 26
Pro portfolio
12 · 46%
Blocked
8 · 31%
Inappropriate
4 · 15%
Previous Client
1 · 4%
Too young/old
1 · 4%
Atlanta — Fresh Leads Focus
Fresh LeadsFB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc. 442 leads · 324 bad · 73.3% · 0 booked · Net: 0.0%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#AT1FX 147 35 112 23.8% 1 0.7% 16 10.9% 8 5.4% 8 106 72.1%
#ATKIDSX 295 83 212 28.1% 10 3.4% 10 207 70.2%
TOTAL 442 118 324 26.7% 1 0.2% 26 5.9% 8 1.8% 0 18 313 70.8% 0
Atlanta — Top Rejection Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
DUPLICATE Lead1100.0%
Atlanta — Top Removal Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
Pro portfolio1246.2%
Blocked830.8%
Inappropriate415.4%
Previous Client13.8%
Too young/old13.8%
Leads In
1,372
Usable
1,074
78.3%
Non-Usable
298
21.7%
OOA
62
Booked
73
Gross: 5.3%
Net Book Rate
6.8%
booked / usable
Fresh Leads FB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc.
In
1,071
Good
827
Bad
244
Good %
77.2%
60 booked · Net: 7.3%
Alan (4AB) 4AB codes only
In
1
Good
0
Bad
1
Good %
0.0%
0 booked · Net: 0.0%
Neil Recycled 5AB, 6AB, CMN, NIN, N1N codes
In
230
Good
181
Bad
49
Good %
78.7%
5 booked · Net: 2.8%
Retargeted (R) codes ending in R
In
70
Good
66
Bad
4
Good %
94.3%
8 booked · Net: 12.1%
Dallas — By Source
SourceInRejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BadUsableBad %BookedNet Book %
Lead Pronto 168 12 7.1% 48 28.6% 3 1.8% 21 12.5% 24 7 4.2% 66 102 39.3% 7 6.9%
Neil Recycled 230 1 0.4% 29 12.6% 2 0.9% 4 1.7% 23 21 9.1% 49 181 21.3% 5 2.8%
Blue Rooms 643 25 3.9% 75 11.7% 29 4.5% 26 4.0% 20 24 3.7% 121 522 18.8% 40 7.7%
Alan 331 17 5.1% 39 11.8% 0 24 7.3% 15 10 3.0% 62 269 18.7% 21 7.8%
Dallas — Material Issues (reasons that hit >3% of a supplier's leads — 7 flagged)
Supplier Supplier Leads Type Reason Count % of Supplier Leads
Lead Pronto 168 Removal Duplicate 21 12.5%
Alan 331 Removal Duplicate 24 7.3%
Lead Pronto 168 Removal Inappropriate 11 6.5%
Blue Rooms 643 Removal Blocked 29 4.5%
Lead Pronto 168 Removal Pro portfolio 7 4.2%
Blue Rooms 643 Removal Duplicate 26 4.0%
Lead Pronto 168 Rejection DO NOT CALL 6 3.6%
Dallas — Top 5 Rejection Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Rejected#1#2#3#4#5
Blue Rooms 25
DO NOT CALL
17 · 68%
DUPLICATE Lead
4 · 16%
Out Of State
3 · 12%
Wrong Number
1 · 4%
—
Alan 17
Out Of State
6 · 35%
DUPLICATE Lead
4 · 24%
Been to Us Already
3 · 18%
DO NOT CALL
2 · 12%
Unemployed Undocumented
2 · 12%
Lead Pronto 12
DO NOT CALL
6 · 50%
DUPLICATE Lead
3 · 25%
Wrong Number
2 · 17%
Been to Us Already
1 · 8%
—
Neil Recycled 1
DUPLICATE Lead
1 · 100%
————
Dallas — Top 5 Removal Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Removed#1#2#3#4#5
Blue Rooms 75
Blocked
29 · 39%
Duplicate
26 · 35%
Inappropriate
10 · 13%
Pro portfolio
7 · 9%
Too young/old
2 · 3%
Lead Pronto 48
Duplicate
21 · 44%
Inappropriate
11 · 23%
Pro portfolio
7 · 15%
Too young/old
5 · 10%
Blocked
3 · 6%
Alan 39
Duplicate
24 · 62%
Pro portfolio
7 · 18%
Previous Client
3 · 8%
Too young/old
3 · 8%
Inappropriate
2 · 5%
Neil Recycled 29
Too young/old
6 · 21%
Pro portfolio
5 · 17%
Inappropriate
5 · 17%
Duplicate
4 · 14%
Previous Client
3 · 10%
Dallas — Fresh Leads Focus
Fresh LeadsFB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc. 1,071 leads · 244 bad · 22.8% · 60 booked · Net: 7.3%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#DALKIDS 1 0 1 0.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0%
#DALFB33F 1 0 1 0.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0%
#DAL3CX2F 3 1 2 33.3% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 1
#DALP2 161 95 66 59.0% 12 7.5% 48 29.8% 3 1.9% 21 13.0% 24 7 4.3% 7 7.4%
#DAL3CX3F 5 3 2 60.0% 1 20.0% 1 1 20.0%
#DALFB32F 6 4 2 66.7% 2 33.3% 1 16.7% 1
#DAL1FX 301 207 94 68.8% 15 5.0% 66 21.9% 25 8.3% 26 8.6% 15 15 5.0% 16 7.7%
#DALFB31F 8 6 2 75.0% 2 25.0% 2 25.0%
#DALFB31M 57 43 14 75.4% 4 7.0% 10 17.5% 9 15.8% 1 7 16.3%
#DAL3CX2M 5 4 1 80.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0%
#DAL3CX1M 64 52 12 81.3% 4 6.3% 4 6.3% 1 1.6% 3 4 6.3% 5 9.6%
#DAL3CX1F 103 85 18 82.5% 7 6.8% 11 10.7% 4 3.9% 7 2 1.9% 1 1.2%
#DALFB32M 19 17 2 89.5% 2 10.5% 2 10.5%
#DALKIDSX 286 260 26 90.9% 10 3.5% 8 2.8% 3 1.0% 5 9 3.1% 18 6.9%
#DALSNAP 46 45 1 97.8% 1 2.2% 1 2.2% 6 13.3%
#DALGX 5 5 0 100.0%
TOTAL 1,071 827 244 77.2% 53 4.9% 159 14.8% 32 3.0% 69 6.4% 58 39 3.6% 60 7.3%
Alan (4AB)4AB codes only 1 leads · 1 bad · 100.0% · 0 booked · Net: 0.0%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#DAL4AB 1 0 1 0.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0%
TOTAL 1 0 1 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0 0 0 1 100.0% 0
Neil Recycled5AB, 6AB, CMN, NIN, N1N codes 230 leads · 49 bad · 21.3% · 5 booked · Net: 2.8%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#DAL6AB 133 95 38 71.4% 1 0.8% 24 18.0% 2 1.5% 3 2.3% 19 15 11.3% 1 1.1%
#DALN1N 65 56 9 86.2% 5 7.7% 1 1.5% 4 4 6.2% 1 1.8%
#DALCMN 12 11 1 91.7% 1 8.3%
#DAL5AB 20 19 1 95.0% 1 5.0% 3 15.8%
TOTAL 230 181 49 78.7% 1 0.4% 29 12.6% 2 0.9% 4 1.7% 23 21 9.1% 5 2.8%
Retargeted (R)codes ending in R 70 leads · 4 bad · 5.7% · 8 booked · Net: 12.1%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#DALFB31FR 3 2 1 66.7% 1 33.3% 1 33.3%
#DAL1FXR 15 13 2 86.7% 1 6.7% 1 6.7% 1 6.7% 1 7.7%
#DALKIDSXR 22 21 1 95.5% 1 4.5% 1 4 19.0%
#DALFB32FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#DALGXR 4 4 0 100.0% 1 25.0%
#DALDXR 1 1 0 100.0%
#DALSNAPR 5 5 0 100.0%
#DAL3CX2FR 2 2 0 100.0%
#DALFB31MR 2 2 0 100.0%
#DALP2R 7 7 0 100.0%
#DAL3CX1FR 5 5 0 100.0% 1 20.0%
#DAL3CX1MR 1 1 0 100.0% 1 100.0%
#DALFB32MR 2 2 0 100.0%
TOTAL 70 66 4 94.3% 0 3 4.3% 0 2 2.9% 1 1 1.4% 8 12.1%
Dallas — Top Rejection Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
DO NOT CALL2545.5%
DUPLICATE Lead1221.8%
Out Of State916.4%
Been to Us Already47.3%
Wrong Number35.5%
Unemployed Undocumented23.6%
Dallas — Top Removal Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
Duplicate7539.3%
Blocked3417.8%
Inappropriate2814.7%
Pro portfolio2613.6%
Too young/old168.4%
Previous Client84.2%
Not Suitable21.0%
No Photo21.0%
Leads In
845
Usable
677
80.1%
Non-Usable
168
19.9%
OOA
70
Booked
59
Gross: 7.0%
Net Book Rate
8.7%
booked / usable
Fresh Leads FB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc.
In
574
Good
472
Bad
102
Good %
82.2%
50 booked · Net: 10.6%
Alan (4AB) 4AB codes only
In
1
Good
1
Bad
0
Good %
100.0%
0 booked · Net: 0.0%
Neil Recycled 5AB, 6AB, CMN, NIN, N1N codes
In
212
Good
152
Bad
60
Good %
71.7%
4 booked · Net: 2.6%
Retargeted (R) codes ending in R
In
58
Good
52
Bad
6
Good %
89.7%
5 booked · Net: 9.6%
Nashville — By Source
SourceInRejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BadUsableBad %BookedNet Book %
Neil Recycled 212 4 1.9% 19 9.0% 2 0.9% 1 0.5% 16 43 20.3% 60 152 28.3% 4 2.6%
Lead Pronto 122 4 3.3% 15 12.3% 0 9 7.4% 6 8 6.6% 26 96 21.3% 5 5.2%
Blue Rooms 382 3 0.8% 46 12.0% 9 2.4% 11 2.9% 26 15 3.9% 62 320 16.2% 41 12.8%
Alan 129 4 3.1% 14 10.9% 0 8 6.2% 6 4 3.1% 20 109 15.5% 9 8.3%
Nashville — Material Issues (reasons that hit >3% of a supplier's leads — 3 flagged)
Supplier Supplier Leads Type Reason Count % of Supplier Leads
Lead Pronto 122 Removal Duplicate 9 7.4%
Alan 129 Removal Duplicate 8 6.2%
Lead Pronto 122 Removal Inappropriate 5 4.1%
Nashville — Top 5 Rejection Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Rejected#1#2#3#4#5
Alan 4
Wrong Number
2 · 50%
DUPLICATE Lead
1 · 25%
Been to Us Already
1 · 25%
——
Neil Recycled 4
Out Of State
2 · 50%
DUPLICATE Lead
1 · 25%
Wrong Number
1 · 25%
——
Lead Pronto 4
Wrong Number
2 · 50%
Out Of State
1 · 25%
DO NOT CALL
1 · 25%
——
Blue Rooms 3
Unemployed Undocumented
2 · 67%
Been to Us Already
1 · 33%
———
Nashville — Top 5 Removal Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Removed#1#2#3#4#5
Blue Rooms 46
Duplicate
11 · 24%
Blocked
9 · 20%
Previous Client
8 · 17%
Inappropriate
8 · 17%
Pro portfolio
7 · 15%
Neil Recycled 19
Inappropriate
6 · 32%
Pro portfolio
4 · 21%
Previous Client
3 · 16%
Too young/old
2 · 11%
Blocked
2 · 11%
Lead Pronto 15
Duplicate
9 · 60%
Inappropriate
5 · 33%
Pro portfolio
1 · 7%
——
Alan 14
Duplicate
8 · 57%
Pro portfolio
3 · 21%
Inappropriate
2 · 14%
Too young/old
1 · 7%
—
Nashville — Fresh Leads Focus
Fresh LeadsFB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc. 574 leads · 102 bad · 17.8% · 50 booked · Net: 10.6%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#NAFB31F 5 3 2 60.0% 2 40.0% 2 40.0%
#NAFB32F 5 3 2 60.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0%
#NA3CX1F 24 16 8 66.7% 1 4.2% 7 29.2% 4 16.7% 3 1 4.2% 1 6.3%
#NA1FX 164 122 42 74.4% 3 1.8% 38 23.2% 8 4.9% 8 4.9% 22 3 1.8% 12 9.8%
#NA3CX2F 4 3 1 75.0% 1 25.0%
#NALP2 106 83 23 78.3% 3 2.8% 14 13.2% 9 8.5% 5 7 6.6% 4 4.8%
#NA3CX1M 12 10 2 83.3% 1 8.3% 1 8.3% 1 8.3% 1 10.0%
#NAKIDSX 191 171 20 89.5% 8 4.2% 1 0.5% 3 1.6% 4 12 6.3% 27 15.8%
#NAFB31M 25 23 2 92.0% 1 4.0% 1 4.0% 1 1 4.0% 1 4.3%
#NASSNAP 24 24 0 100.0% 2 8.3%
#NAFB32M 12 12 0 100.0% 2 16.7%
#NA3CX3F 1 1 0 100.0%
#NASGX 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 574 472 102 82.2% 10 1.7% 72 12.5% 9 1.6% 28 4.9% 35 25 4.4% 50 10.6%
Alan (4AB)4AB codes only 1 leads · 0 bad · 0.0% · 0 booked · Net: 0.0%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#NA4ABR 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 1 1 0 100.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Neil Recycled5AB, 6AB, CMN, NIN, N1N codes 212 leads · 60 bad · 28.3% · 4 booked · Net: 2.6%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#NAN1N 47 30 17 63.8% 2 4.3% 6 12.8% 6 13 27.7%
#NA6AB 128 90 38 70.3% 2 1.6% 12 9.4% 2 1.6% 1 0.8% 9 26 20.3% 2 2.2%
#NACMN 14 12 2 85.7% 2 14.3% 1 8.3%
#NA5AB 23 20 3 87.0% 1 4.3% 1 2 8.7% 1 5.0%
TOTAL 212 152 60 71.7% 4 1.9% 19 9.0% 2 0.9% 1 0.5% 16 43 20.3% 4 2.6%
Retargeted (R)codes ending in R 58 leads · 6 bad · 10.3% · 5 booked · Net: 9.6%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#NADXR 3 2 1 66.7% 1 33.3% 1
#NA3CX1MR 3 2 1 66.7% 1 33.3%
#NALP2R 16 13 3 81.3% 1 6.3% 1 6.3% 1 1 6.3% 1 7.7%
#NA1FXR 12 11 1 91.7% 1 8.3% 1 2 18.2%
#NAFB32MR 3 3 0 100.0%
#NASSNAPR 2 2 0 100.0%
#NASGXR 4 4 0 100.0%
#NAKIDSXR 5 5 0 100.0% 2 40.0%
#NA3CX1FR 3 3 0 100.0%
#NAFB33FR 2 2 0 100.0%
#NAFB32FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#NAFB31MR 1 1 0 100.0%
#NAFB33MR 2 2 0 100.0%
#NAFB31FR 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 58 52 6 89.7% 1 1.7% 3 5.2% 0 0 3 2 3.4% 5 9.6%
Nashville — Top Rejection Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
Wrong Number533.3%
Out Of State320.0%
DUPLICATE Lead213.3%
Been to Us Already213.3%
Unemployed Undocumented213.3%
DO NOT CALL16.7%
Nashville — Top Removal Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
Duplicate2930.9%
Inappropriate2122.3%
Pro portfolio1516.0%
Previous Client1111.7%
Blocked1111.7%
Too young/old66.4%
No Photo11.1%
Leads In
1,346
Usable
1,084
80.5%
Non-Usable
262
19.5%
OOA
77
Booked
59
Gross: 4.4%
Net Book Rate
5.4%
booked / usable
Fresh Leads FB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc.
In
983
Good
795
Bad
188
Good %
80.9%
53 booked · Net: 6.7%
Alan (4AB)
—
Neil Recycled 5AB, 6AB, CMN, NIN, N1N codes
In
308
Good
242
Bad
66
Good %
78.6%
6 booked · Net: 2.5%
Retargeted (R) codes ending in R
In
55
Good
47
Bad
8
Good %
85.5%
0 booked · Net: 0.0%
Houston — By Source
SourceInRejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BadUsableBad %BookedNet Book %
Lead Pronto 238 8 3.4% 42 17.6% 3 1.3% 20 8.4% 19 6 2.5% 54 184 22.7% 9 4.9%
Neil Recycled 308 5 1.6% 30 9.7% 1 0.3% 8 2.6% 21 36 11.7% 66 242 21.4% 6 2.5%
Blue Rooms 529 8 1.5% 74 14.0% 23 4.3% 19 3.6% 32 20 3.8% 99 430 18.7% 28 6.5%
Alan 271 11 4.1% 20 7.4% 1 0.4% 9 3.3% 10 15 5.5% 43 228 15.9% 16 7.0%
Houston — Material Issues (reasons that hit >3% of a supplier's leads — 6 flagged)
Supplier Supplier Leads Type Reason Count % of Supplier Leads
Lead Pronto 238 Removal Duplicate 20 8.4%
Blue Rooms 529 Removal Blocked 23 4.3%
Lead Pronto 238 Removal Inappropriate 9 3.8%
Blue Rooms 529 Removal Duplicate 19 3.6%
Lead Pronto 238 Removal Pro portfolio 8 3.4%
Alan 271 Removal Duplicate 9 3.3%
Houston — Top 5 Rejection Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Rejected#1#2#3#4#5
Alan 11
Wrong Number
6 · 55%
DUPLICATE Lead
2 · 18%
DO NOT CALL
2 · 18%
Been to Us Already
1 · 9%
—
Blue Rooms 8
Wrong Number
6 · 75%
DUPLICATE Lead
1 · 13%
DO NOT CALL
1 · 13%
——
Lead Pronto 8
Wrong Number
4 · 50%
DO NOT CALL
2 · 25%
Out Of State
1 · 13%
Been to Us Already
1 · 13%
—
Neil Recycled 5
Out Of State
2 · 40%
DO NOT CALL
1 · 20%
Wrong Number
1 · 20%
DUPLICATE Lead
1 · 20%
—
Houston — Top 5 Removal Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Removed#1#2#3#4#5
Blue Rooms 74
Blocked
23 · 31%
Duplicate
19 · 26%
Pro portfolio
11 · 15%
Previous Client
10 · 14%
Inappropriate
10 · 14%
Lead Pronto 42
Duplicate
20 · 48%
Inappropriate
9 · 21%
Pro portfolio
8 · 19%
Blocked
3 · 7%
Too young/old
2 · 5%
Neil Recycled 30
Duplicate
8 · 27%
Pro portfolio
6 · 20%
Inappropriate
6 · 20%
Previous Client
4 · 13%
Too young/old
3 · 10%
Alan 20
Duplicate
9 · 45%
Pro portfolio
7 · 35%
Inappropriate
2 · 10%
Blocked
1 · 5%
Previous Client
1 · 5%
Houston — Fresh Leads Focus
Fresh LeadsFB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc. 983 leads · 188 bad · 19.1% · 53 booked · Net: 6.7%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#HOU3DE1M 1 0 1 0.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 100.0%
#HOU3CX2M 2 1 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 1
#HOU1FX 173 104 69 60.1% 2 1.2% 61 35.3% 22 12.7% 14 8.1% 25 9 5.2% 9 8.7%
#HOU3CX1M 31 23 8 74.2% 1 3.2% 4 12.9% 1 3.2% 2 6.5% 1 4 12.9% 3 13.0%
#HOULP2 226 175 51 77.4% 6 2.7% 41 18.1% 3 1.3% 20 8.8% 18 5 2.2% 9 5.1%
#HOUFB31F 35 28 7 80.0% 2 5.7% 3 8.6% 2 5.7% 1 2 5.7%
#HOUGX 5 4 1 80.0% 1 20.0%
#HOU3CX1F 48 41 7 85.4% 1 2.1% 4 8.3% 4 2 4.2% 5 12.2%
#HOUFB31M 91 78 13 85.7% 4 4.4% 7 7.7% 4 4.4% 3 2 2.2% 7 9.0%
#HOUFB32M 10 9 1 90.0% 1 10.0% 1 10.0%
#HOUKIDSX 334 305 29 91.3% 5 1.5% 13 3.9% 1 0.3% 5 1.5% 7 11 3.3% 17 5.6%
#HOUSNAP 13 13 0 100.0% 2 15.4%
#HOUFB32F 11 11 0 100.0% 1 9.1%
#HOUFB33M 1 1 0 100.0%
#HOU3CX2F 1 1 0 100.0%
#HOUFB33F 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 983 795 188 80.9% 24 2.4% 135 13.7% 27 2.7% 48 4.9% 60 36 3.7% 53 6.7%
Neil Recycled5AB, 6AB, CMN, NIN, N1N codes 308 leads · 66 bad · 21.4% · 6 booked · Net: 2.5%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#HOU6AB 172 130 42 75.6% 3 1.7% 19 11.0% 1 0.6% 4 2.3% 14 23 13.4% 3 2.3%
#HOU5AB 43 34 9 79.1% 1 2.3% 5 11.6% 2 4.7% 3 3 7.0% 1 2.9%
#HOUN1N 66 54 12 81.8% 6 9.1% 2 3.0% 4 7 10.6% 1 1.9%
#HOUCMN 27 24 3 88.9% 1 3.7% 3 11.1% 1 4.2%
TOTAL 308 242 66 78.6% 5 1.6% 30 9.7% 1 0.3% 8 2.6% 21 36 11.7% 6 2.5%
Retargeted (R)codes ending in R 55 leads · 8 bad · 14.5% · 0 booked · Net: 0.0%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#HOUGXR 2 1 1 50.0% 1 50.0%
#HOUFB32FR 2 1 1 50.0% 1 50.0%
#HOUFB32MR 3 2 1 66.7% 1 33.3%
#HOU3CX1FR 3 2 1 66.7% 1 33.3%
#HOULP2R 12 9 3 75.0% 2 16.7% 1 8.3% 1 1 8.3%
#HOU1FXR 15 14 1 93.3% 1 6.7%
#HOUPXR 1 1 0 100.0%
#HOUSNAPR 4 4 0 100.0%
#HOUKXR 1 1 0 100.0%
#HOUFB31MR 4 4 0 100.0%
#HOUFB31FR 2 2 0 100.0%
#HOUKIDSXR 3 3 0 100.0%
#HOU3CX2MR 1 1 0 100.0%
#HOUFB33FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#HOU3CX1MR 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 55 47 8 85.5% 3 5.5% 1 1.8% 0 0 1 5 9.1% 0
Houston — Top Rejection Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
Wrong Number1753.1%
DO NOT CALL618.8%
DUPLICATE Lead412.5%
Out Of State39.4%
Been to Us Already26.3%
Houston — Top Removal Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
Duplicate5633.7%
Pro portfolio3219.3%
Blocked2816.9%
Inappropriate2716.3%
Previous Client159.0%
Too young/old63.6%
No Photo21.2%
Leads In
1,303
Usable
1,057
81.1%
Non-Usable
246
18.9%
OOA
70
Booked
50
Gross: 3.8%
Net Book Rate
4.7%
booked / usable
Fresh Leads FB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc.
In
944
Good
769
Bad
175
Good %
81.5%
42 booked · Net: 5.5%
Alan (4AB)
—
Neil Recycled 5AB, 6AB, CMN, NIN, N1N codes
In
291
Good
225
Bad
66
Good %
77.3%
6 booked · Net: 2.7%
Retargeted (R) codes ending in R
In
68
Good
63
Bad
5
Good %
92.6%
2 booked · Net: 3.2%
Chicago — By Source
SourceInRejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BadUsableBad %BookedNet Book %
Neil Recycled 291 1 0.3% 37 12.7% 2 0.7% 12 4.1% 23 30 10.3% 66 225 22.7% 6 2.7%
Blue Rooms 560 2 0.4% 73 13.0% 25 4.5% 24 4.3% 24 36 6.4% 108 452 19.3% 11 2.4%
Lead Pronto 234 4 1.7% 40 17.1% 0 28 12.0% 12 0 44 190 18.8% 18 9.5%
Alan 218 6 2.8% 18 8.3% 0 12 5.5% 6 4 1.8% 28 190 12.8% 15 7.9%
Chicago — Material Issues (reasons that hit >3% of a supplier's leads — 6 flagged)
Supplier Supplier Leads Type Reason Count % of Supplier Leads
Lead Pronto 234 Removal Duplicate 28 12.0%
Alan 218 Removal Duplicate 12 5.5%
Blue Rooms 560 Removal Blocked 25 4.5%
Blue Rooms 560 Removal Duplicate 24 4.3%
Neil Recycled 291 Removal Duplicate 12 4.1%
Neil Recycled 291 Removal No Photo 9 3.1%
Chicago — Top 5 Rejection Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Rejected#1#2#3#4#5
Alan 6
DUPLICATE Lead
3 · 50%
DO NOT CALL
2 · 33%
Unemployed Undocumented
1 · 17%
——
Lead Pronto 4
DUPLICATE Lead
3 · 75%
DO NOT CALL
1 · 25%
———
Blue Rooms 2
DUPLICATE Lead
1 · 50%
Wrong Number
1 · 50%
———
Neil Recycled 1
Been to Us Already
1 · 100%
————
Chicago — Top 5 Removal Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Removed#1#2#3#4#5
Blue Rooms 73
Blocked
25 · 34%
Duplicate
24 · 33%
Inappropriate
7 · 10%
Previous Client
7 · 10%
Pro portfolio
7 · 10%
Lead Pronto 40
Duplicate
28 · 70%
Pro portfolio
7 · 18%
Inappropriate
3 · 8%
Previous Client
2 · 5%
—
Neil Recycled 37
Duplicate
12 · 32%
No Photo
9 · 24%
Inappropriate
6 · 16%
Pro portfolio
4 · 11%
Previous Client
3 · 8%
Alan 18
Duplicate
12 · 67%
Previous Client
3 · 17%
Inappropriate
2 · 11%
Pro portfolio
1 · 6%
—
Chicago — Fresh Leads Focus
Fresh LeadsFB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc. 944 leads · 175 bad · 18.5% · 42 booked · Net: 5.5%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#CHI3CX3F 1 0 1 0.0% 1 100.0% 1
#CHI1FX 212 132 80 62.3% 1 0.5% 65 30.7% 23 10.8% 22 10.4% 20 16 7.5% 3 2.3%
#CHIFB31M 63 50 13 79.4% 3 4.8% 10 15.9% 9 14.3% 1 6 12.0%
#CHILP2 234 190 44 81.2% 4 1.7% 40 17.1% 28 12.0% 12 18 9.5%
#CHIFB31F 22 19 3 86.4% 1 4.5% 2 9.1% 1 4.5% 1
#CHI3CX1F 30 26 4 86.7% 3 10.0% 1 3.3% 2 1 3.3% 1 3.8%
#CHIFB32M 9 8 1 88.9% 1 11.1% 1 11.1% 1 12.5%
#CHIKIDSX 296 271 25 91.6% 1 0.3% 5 1.7% 2 0.7% 3 20 6.8% 6 2.2%
#CHISNAP 36 33 3 91.7% 3 8.3% 2 5.6% 1 2 6.1%
#CHI3CX1M 19 18 1 94.7% 1 5.3% 2 11.1%
#CHIFB32F 7 7 0 100.0% 2 28.6%
#CHI3CX3M 2 2 0 100.0% 1 50.0%
#CHI3CX2M 2 2 0 100.0%
#CHI3CX2F 2 2 0 100.0%
#CHIFB33F 1 1 0 100.0%
#CHIGX 7 7 0 100.0%
#CHIFB33M 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 944 769 175 81.5% 10 1.1% 130 13.8% 25 2.6% 64 6.8% 41 38 4.0% 42 5.5%
Neil Recycled5AB, 6AB, CMN, NIN, N1N codes 291 leads · 66 bad · 22.7% · 6 booked · Net: 2.7%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#CHI6AB 168 124 44 73.8% 1 0.6% 27 16.1% 9 5.4% 18 18 10.7% 2 1.6%
#CHICMN 24 19 5 79.2% 2 8.3% 1 4.2% 1 3 12.5% 3 15.8%
#CHIN1N 71 57 14 80.3% 6 8.5% 2 2.8% 1 1.4% 3 8 11.3% 1 1.8%
#CHI5AB 28 25 3 89.3% 2 7.1% 1 3.6% 1 1 3.6%
TOTAL 291 225 66 77.3% 1 0.3% 37 12.7% 2 0.7% 12 4.1% 23 30 10.3% 6 2.7%
Retargeted (R)codes ending in R 68 leads · 5 bad · 7.4% · 2 booked · Net: 3.2%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#CHIKIDSXR 16 13 3 81.3% 2 12.5% 1 6.3%
#CHI1FXR 30 28 2 93.3% 1 3.3% 1 1 3.3% 2 7.1%
#CHISNAPR 9 9 0 100.0%
#CHIFB31MR 3 3 0 100.0%
#CHIFB32MR 2 2 0 100.0%
#CHIFB33FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#CHI3CX1MR 1 1 0 100.0%
#CHIDXR 3 3 0 100.0%
#CHIGXR 2 2 0 100.0%
#CHI3CX1FR 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 68 63 5 92.6% 2 2.9% 1 1.5% 0 0 1 2 2.9% 2 3.2%
Chicago — Top Rejection Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
DUPLICATE Lead753.8%
DO NOT CALL323.1%
Been to Us Already17.7%
Unemployed Undocumented17.7%
Wrong Number17.7%
Chicago — Top Removal Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
Duplicate7645.2%
Blocked2716.1%
Pro portfolio1911.3%
Inappropriate1810.7%
Previous Client158.9%
No Photo95.4%
Too young/old31.8%
Spam10.6%
Leads In
2,870
Usable
2,367
82.5%
Non-Usable
503
17.5%
OOA
76
Booked
102
Gross: 3.6%
Net Book Rate
4.3%
booked / usable
Fresh Leads FB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc.
In
2,247
Good
1,834
Bad
413
Good %
81.6%
84 booked · Net: 4.6%
Alan (4AB)
—
Neil Recycled 5AB, 6AB, CMN, NIN, N1N codes
In
440
Good
358
Bad
82
Good %
81.4%
8 booked · Net: 2.2%
Retargeted (R) codes ending in R
In
183
Good
175
Bad
8
Good %
95.6%
10 booked · Net: 5.7%
Florida — By Source
SourceInRejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BadUsableBad %BookedNet Book %
Organic 81 11 13.6% 16 19.8% 2 2.5% 9 11.1% 5 6 7.4% 30 51 37.0% 3 5.9%
Lead Pronto 577 6 1.0% 108 18.7% 3 0.5% 53 9.2% 52 27 4.7% 136 441 23.6% 16 3.6%
Neil Recycled 440 17 3.9% 41 9.3% 4 0.9% 9 2.0% 28 27 6.1% 82 358 18.6% 8 2.2%
Blue Rooms 1,267 10 0.8% 166 13.1% 57 4.5% 55 4.3% 54 10 0.8% 185 1,082 14.6% 53 4.9%
Alan 505 7 1.4% 57 11.3% 2 0.4% 38 7.5% 17 6 1.2% 70 435 13.9% 22 5.1%
Florida — Material Issues (reasons that hit >3% of a supplier's leads — 8 flagged)
Supplier Supplier Leads Type Reason Count % of Supplier Leads
Organic 81 Removal Duplicate 9 11.1%
Lead Pronto 577 Removal Duplicate 53 9.2%
Organic 81 Rejection DUPLICATE Lead 7 8.6%
Alan 505 Removal Duplicate 38 7.5%
Blue Rooms 1,267 Removal Blocked 57 4.5%
Blue Rooms 1,267 Removal Duplicate 55 4.3%
Lead Pronto 577 Removal Inappropriate 23 4.0%
Organic 81 Removal Previous Client 3 3.7%
Florida — Top 5 Rejection Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Rejected#1#2#3#4#5
Neil Recycled 17
DUPLICATE Lead
9 · 53%
DO NOT CALL
6 · 35%
Unemployed Undocumented
1 · 6%
Wrong Number
1 · 6%
—
Organic 11
DUPLICATE Lead
7 · 64%
Too Young
1 · 9%
Wrong Number
1 · 9%
Been to Us Already
1 · 9%
Out Of State
1 · 9%
Blue Rooms 10
Wrong Number
5 · 50%
DO NOT CALL
3 · 30%
DUPLICATE Lead
2 · 20%
——
Alan 7
DUPLICATE Lead
3 · 43%
Wrong Number
2 · 29%
Been to Us Already
1 · 14%
DO NOT CALL
1 · 14%
—
Lead Pronto 6
DUPLICATE Lead
3 · 50%
DO NOT CALL
2 · 33%
Wrong Number
1 · 17%
——
Florida — Top 5 Removal Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Removed#1#2#3#4#5
Blue Rooms 166
Blocked
57 · 34%
Duplicate
55 · 33%
Pro portfolio
28 · 17%
Previous Client
14 · 8%
Too young/old
5 · 3%
Lead Pronto 108
Duplicate
53 · 49%
Inappropriate
23 · 21%
Too young/old
15 · 14%
Pro portfolio
9 · 8%
Previous Client
3 · 3%
Alan 57
Duplicate
38 · 67%
Pro portfolio
7 · 12%
Inappropriate
6 · 11%
Previous Client
2 · 4%
Blocked
2 · 4%
Neil Recycled 41
Inappropriate
10 · 24%
Duplicate
9 · 22%
No Photo
6 · 15%
Too young/old
5 · 12%
Blocked
4 · 10%
Organic 16
Duplicate
9 · 56%
Previous Client
3 · 19%
Blocked
2 · 13%
Inappropriate
1 · 6%
Pro portfolio
1 · 6%
Florida — Fresh Leads Focus
Fresh LeadsFB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc. 2,247 leads · 413 bad · 18.4% · 84 booked · Net: 4.6%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#FL3CX3F 4 2 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 1
#FL3CX2F 4 2 2 50.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 1 25.0%
#FL01 81 51 30 63.0% 11 13.6% 16 19.8% 2 2.5% 9 11.1% 5 6 7.4% 3 5.9%
#FLFB31F 28 18 10 64.3% 10 35.7% 7 25.0% 3
#ORLP2 353 266 87 75.4% 3 0.8% 63 17.8% 28 7.9% 35 25 7.1% 9 3.4%
#FL1FX 301 228 73 75.7% 1 0.3% 72 23.9% 30 10.0% 22 7.3% 20 16 7.0%
#FLP2 205 158 47 77.1% 3 1.5% 44 21.5% 3 1.5% 25 12.2% 16 1 0.5% 6 3.8%
#ORL1FX 327 257 70 78.6% 3 0.9% 64 19.6% 21 6.4% 28 8.6% 15 3 0.9% 15 5.8%
#FLFB31M 71 57 14 80.3% 1 1.4% 13 18.3% 10 14.1% 3 4 7.0%
#ORLFB31M 75 61 14 81.3% 1 1.3% 11 14.7% 8 10.7% 3 2 2.7% 4 6.6%
#FL3CX1F 77 64 13 83.1% 12 15.6% 2 2.6% 6 7.8% 4 1 1.3% 2 3.1%
#FL3CX1M 46 40 6 87.0% 5 10.9% 2 4.3% 3 1 2.2% 2 5.0%
#ORLFB32F 8 7 1 87.5% 1 12.5%
#FLSNAP 8 7 1 87.5% 1 12.5% 1 12.5% 1 14.3%
#ORLSNAP 25 22 3 88.0% 2 8.0% 1 4.0% 1 1 4.5%
#FLFB32F 9 8 1 88.9% 1 11.1% 1 11.1%
#FLKIDSX 593 555 38 93.6% 4 0.7% 28 4.7% 5 0.8% 5 0.8% 18 7 1.2% 20 3.6%
#ORLFB31F 22 21 1 95.5% 1 4.5% 1 4.5% 1 4.8%
#FLGX 6 6 0 100.0%
#FL3CX2M 1 1 0 100.0%
#ORLGX 3 3 0 100.0%
TOTAL 2,247 1,834 413 81.6% 31 1.4% 344 15.3% 64 2.8% 153 6.8% 127 47 2.1% 84 4.6%
Neil Recycled5AB, 6AB, CMN, NIN, N1N codes 440 leads · 82 bad · 18.6% · 8 booked · Net: 2.2%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#ORLCMN 11 8 3 72.7% 2 18.2% 1 9.1%
#FLN1N 55 42 13 76.4% 5 9.1% 8 14.5% 1 1.8% 2 3.6% 5 1 1.8% 2 4.8%
#FL6AB 158 125 33 79.1% 6 3.8% 18 11.4% 1 0.6% 3 1.9% 14 9 5.7%
#ORL5AB 10 8 2 80.0% 1 10.0% 1 1 10.0%
#ORL6AB 89 72 17 80.9% 9 10.1% 2 2.2% 2 2.2% 5 9 10.1% 4 5.6%
#ORLN1N 57 47 10 82.5% 1 1.8% 5 8.8% 2 3.5% 3 5 8.8%
#FL5AB 39 36 3 92.3% 2 5.1% 1 2.6%
#FLCMN 21 20 1 95.2% 1 4.8% 2 10.0%
TOTAL 440 358 82 81.4% 17 3.9% 41 9.3% 4 0.9% 9 2.0% 28 27 6.1% 8 2.2%
Retargeted (R)codes ending in R 183 leads · 8 bad · 4.4% · 10 booked · Net: 5.7%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#FLGXR 1 0 1 0.0% 1 100.0%
#FLFB31FR 2 1 1 50.0% 1 50.0%
#ORLP2R 19 17 2 89.5% 1 5.3% 1 1 5.3% 1 5.9%
#FLFB31MR 11 10 1 90.9% 1 9.1% 1 10.0%
#ORLFB31MR 15 14 1 93.3% 1 6.7%
#ORL1FXR 30 29 1 96.7% 1 3.3% 1 3.3% 2 6.9%
#FLKIDSXR 36 35 1 97.2% 1 2.8% 1 2.8% 3 8.6%
#FLSNAPR 2 2 0 100.0%
#FL1FXR 39 39 0 100.0% 3 7.7%
#FLDXR 3 3 0 100.0%
#ORLGXR 4 4 0 100.0%
#ORL4IG31MR 1 1 0 100.0%
#ORLDXR 3 3 0 100.0%
#FL01R 2 2 0 100.0%
#FL3CX3FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#ORLSNAPR 2 2 0 100.0%
#FL3CX1FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#FL4IG32FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#FL3CX1MR 3 3 0 100.0%
#ORL4IG31FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#ORLFB31FR 1 1 0 100.0%
#ORLFB32FR 3 3 0 100.0%
#FLFB32FR 2 2 0 100.0%
TOTAL 183 175 8 95.6% 3 1.6% 3 1.6% 0 2 1.1% 1 2 1.1% 10 5.7%
Florida — Top Rejection Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
DUPLICATE Lead2447.1%
DO NOT CALL1223.5%
Wrong Number1019.6%
Been to Us Already23.9%
Too Young12.0%
Out Of State12.0%
Unemployed Undocumented12.0%
Florida — Top Removal Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
Duplicate16442.3%
Blocked6817.5%
Pro portfolio4812.4%
Inappropriate4511.6%
Too young/old266.7%
Previous Client266.7%
No Photo61.5%
Not Suitable51.3%
Leads In
1,271
Usable
1,056
83.1%
Non-Usable
215
16.9%
OOA
72
Booked
92
Gross: 7.2%
Net Book Rate
8.7%
booked / usable
Fresh Leads FB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc.
In
810
Good
678
Bad
132
Good %
83.7%
75 booked · Net: 11.1%
Alan (4AB)
—
Neil Recycled 5AB, 6AB, CMN, NIN, N1N codes
In
393
Good
312
Bad
81
Good %
79.4%
13 booked · Net: 4.2%
Retargeted (R) codes ending in R
In
68
Good
66
Bad
2
Good %
97.1%
4 booked · Net: 6.1%
New York — By Source
SourceInRejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BadUsableBad %BookedNet Book %
Neil Recycled 393 6 1.5% 34 8.7% 3 0.8% 12 3.1% 19 50 12.7% 81 312 20.6% 13 4.2%
Lead Pronto 166 6 3.6% 27 16.3% 3 1.8% 14 8.4% 10 0 33 133 19.9% 5 3.8%
Blue Rooms 651 13 2.0% 67 10.3% 23 3.5% 15 2.3% 29 21 3.2% 97 554 14.9% 71 12.8%
Alan 61 0 3 4.9% 0 2 3.3% 1 1 1.6% 4 57 6.6% 3 5.3%
New York — Material Issues (reasons that hit >3% of a supplier's leads — 6 flagged)
Supplier Supplier Leads Type Reason Count % of Supplier Leads
Lead Pronto 166 Removal Duplicate 14 8.4%
Blue Rooms 651 Removal Blocked 23 3.5%
Alan 61 Removal Duplicate 2 3.3%
Blue Rooms 651 Removal Pro portfolio 20 3.1%
Neil Recycled 393 Removal Duplicate 12 3.1%
Lead Pronto 166 Removal Pro portfolio 5 3.0%
New York — Top 5 Rejection Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Rejected#1#2#3#4#5
Blue Rooms 13
DO NOT CALL
4 · 31%
DUPLICATE Lead
3 · 23%
Wrong Number
2 · 15%
Out Of State
2 · 15%
Unemployed Undocumented
1 · 8%
Neil Recycled 6
DO NOT CALL
6 · 100%
————
Lead Pronto 6
Wrong Number
3 · 50%
DUPLICATE Lead
2 · 33%
DO NOT CALL
1 · 17%
——
New York — Top 5 Removal Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Removed#1#2#3#4#5
Blue Rooms 67
Blocked
23 · 34%
Pro portfolio
20 · 30%
Duplicate
15 · 22%
Previous Client
4 · 6%
Inappropriate
2 · 3%
Neil Recycled 34
Duplicate
12 · 35%
Inappropriate
7 · 21%
Previous Client
7 · 21%
Pro portfolio
3 · 9%
Blocked
3 · 9%
Lead Pronto 27
Duplicate
14 · 52%
Pro portfolio
5 · 19%
Blocked
3 · 11%
Inappropriate
2 · 7%
Previous Client
2 · 7%
Alan 3
Duplicate
2 · 67%
Pro portfolio
1 · 33%
———
New York — Fresh Leads Focus
Fresh LeadsFB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc. 810 leads · 132 bad · 16.3% · 75 booked · Net: 11.1%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#NY3CX1F 3 2 1 66.7% 1 33.3% 1
#NY3CX1M 3 2 1 66.7% 1 33.3%
#NY1FX 232 164 68 70.7% 6 2.6% 57 24.6% 22 9.5% 13 5.6% 22 8 3.4% 14 8.5%
#NYLP2 156 123 33 78.8% 6 3.8% 27 17.3% 3 1.9% 14 9.0% 10 5 4.1%
#NYSNAP 14 13 1 92.9% 1 7.1% 1 7.1%
#NYKIDSX 396 368 28 92.9% 7 1.8% 9 2.3% 2 0.5% 7 13 3.3% 56 15.2%
#NYFB32M 2 2 0 100.0%
#NYFB31M 2 2 0 100.0%
#NY3CX2M 1 1 0 100.0%
#NY3CX2F 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 810 678 132 83.7% 19 2.3% 95 11.7% 26 3.2% 29 3.6% 40 22 2.7% 75 11.1%
Neil Recycled5AB, 6AB, CMN, NIN, N1N codes 393 leads · 81 bad · 20.6% · 13 booked · Net: 4.2%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#NYN1N 82 64 18 78.0% 1 1.2% 9 11.0% 1 1.2% 1 1.2% 7 12 14.6% 5 7.8%
#NY6AB 218 171 47 78.4% 1 0.5% 21 9.6% 2 0.9% 10 4.6% 9 29 13.3% 1 0.6%
#NYCMN 42 33 9 78.6% 4 9.5% 6 14.3% 2 6.1%
#NY5AB 51 44 7 86.3% 4 7.8% 1 2.0% 3 3 5.9% 5 11.4%
TOTAL 393 312 81 79.4% 6 1.5% 34 8.7% 3 0.8% 12 3.1% 19 50 12.7% 13 4.2%
Retargeted (R)codes ending in R 68 leads · 2 bad · 2.9% · 4 booked · Net: 6.1%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#NYKIDSXR 40 38 2 95.0% 2 5.0% 2 5.0% 2 5.3%
#NYSNAPR 9 9 0 100.0% 1 11.1%
#NY1FXR 4 4 0 100.0% 1 25.0%
#NYLP2R 10 10 0 100.0%
#NY3CX1FR 3 3 0 100.0%
#NYKPXR 1 1 0 100.0%
#NY3CX1MR 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 68 66 2 97.1% 0 2 2.9% 0 2 2.9% 0 0 4 6.1%
New York — Top Rejection Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
DO NOT CALL1144.0%
Wrong Number520.0%
DUPLICATE Lead520.0%
Out Of State28.0%
Unemployed Undocumented14.0%
No English Spoken14.0%
New York — Top Removal Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
Duplicate4332.8%
Pro portfolio2922.1%
Blocked2922.1%
Previous Client139.9%
Inappropriate118.4%
Too young/old32.3%
No Photo21.5%
Not Suitable10.8%
Leads In
1,100
Usable
916
83.3%
Non-Usable
184
16.7%
OOA
11
Booked
40
Gross: 3.6%
Net Book Rate
4.4%
booked / usable
Fresh Leads FB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc.
In
840
Good
684
Bad
156
Good %
81.4%
35 booked · Net: 5.1%
Alan (4AB)
—
Neil Recycled 5AB, 6AB, CMN, NIN, N1N codes
In
206
Good
180
Bad
26
Good %
87.4%
3 booked · Net: 1.7%
Retargeted (R) codes ending in R
In
54
Good
52
Bad
2
Good %
96.3%
2 booked · Net: 3.8%
Boston — By Source
SourceInRejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BadUsableBad %BookedNet Book %
Lead Pronto 234 15 6.4% 43 18.4% 4 1.7% 20 8.5% 19 0 58 176 24.8% 8 4.5%
Alan 151 3 2.0% 20 13.2% 2 1.3% 10 6.6% 8 0 23 128 15.2% 7 5.5%
Blue Rooms 509 7 1.4% 70 13.8% 25 4.9% 21 4.1% 24 0 77 432 15.1% 22 5.1%
Neil Recycled 206 5 2.4% 10 4.9% 0 2 1.0% 8 11 5.3% 26 180 12.6% 3 1.7%
Boston — Material Issues (reasons that hit >3% of a supplier's leads — 5 flagged)
Supplier Supplier Leads Type Reason Count % of Supplier Leads
Lead Pronto 234 Removal Duplicate 20 8.5%
Alan 151 Removal Duplicate 10 6.6%
Blue Rooms 509 Removal Blocked 25 4.9%
Blue Rooms 509 Removal Duplicate 21 4.1%
Lead Pronto 234 Rejection DO NOT CALL 8 3.4%
Boston — Top 5 Rejection Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Rejected#1#2#3#4#5
Lead Pronto 15
DO NOT CALL
8 · 53%
Wrong Number
3 · 20%
DUPLICATE Lead
3 · 20%
Been to Us Already
1 · 7%
—
Blue Rooms 7
DO NOT CALL
3 · 43%
DUPLICATE Lead
3 · 43%
Wrong Number
1 · 14%
——
Neil Recycled 5
DO NOT CALL
4 · 80%
Too Young
1 · 20%
———
Alan 3
Been to Us Already
2 · 67%
DUPLICATE Lead
1 · 33%
———
Boston — Top 5 Removal Reasons by Supplier
SupplierTotal Removed#1#2#3#4#5
Blue Rooms 70
Blocked
25 · 36%
Duplicate
21 · 30%
Pro portfolio
9 · 13%
Inappropriate
8 · 11%
Previous Client
7 · 10%
Lead Pronto 43
Duplicate
20 · 47%
Pro portfolio
7 · 16%
Too young/old
5 · 12%
Inappropriate
4 · 9%
Blocked
4 · 9%
Alan 20
Duplicate
10 · 50%
Inappropriate
4 · 20%
Previous Client
3 · 15%
Blocked
2 · 10%
Pro portfolio
1 · 5%
Neil Recycled 10
Inappropriate
4 · 40%
No Photo
3 · 30%
Duplicate
2 · 20%
Previous Client
1 · 10%
—
Boston — Fresh Leads Focus
Fresh LeadsFB, IG, LP, 3CX, TC, KIDS, etc. 840 leads · 156 bad · 18.6% · 35 booked · Net: 5.1%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#BO3CX3F 3 2 1 66.7% 1 33.3%
#BOFB32F 7 5 2 71.4% 2 28.6% 1 14.3% 1 14.3%
#BOFB31F 11 8 3 72.7% 3 27.3% 2 18.2% 1
#BOFB31M 19 14 5 73.7% 2 10.5% 3 15.8% 2 10.5% 1 1 7.1%
#BOSLP2 222 164 58 73.9% 15 6.8% 43 19.4% 4 1.8% 20 9.0% 19 8 4.9%
#BOS1FX 295 228 67 77.3% 5 1.7% 62 21.0% 24 8.1% 19 6.4% 19 10 4.4%
#BO3CX1F 38 30 8 78.9% 8 21.1% 1 2.6% 3 7.9% 4 2 6.7%
#BOSSNAP 30 26 4 86.7% 1 3.3% 3 10.0% 1 3.3% 2
#BO3CX1M 31 29 2 93.5% 2 6.5% 1 3.2% 1 2 6.9%
#BOSKIDSX 177 171 6 96.6% 1 0.6% 5 2.8% 2 1.1% 3 12 7.0%
#BO3CX3M 1 1 0 100.0%
#BOFB32M 3 3 0 100.0%
#BO3CX2F 1 1 0 100.0%
#BOSGX 2 2 0 100.0%
TOTAL 840 684 156 81.4% 25 3.0% 131 15.6% 31 3.7% 50 6.0% 50 0 35 5.1%
Neil Recycled5AB, 6AB, CMN, NIN, N1N codes 206 leads · 26 bad · 12.6% · 3 booked · Net: 1.7%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#BOS5AB 13 8 5 61.5% 1 7.7% 2 15.4% 2 2 15.4%
#BOSCMN 14 10 4 71.4% 4 28.6%
#BOSN1N 55 49 6 89.1% 4 7.3% 1 1.8% 3 2 3.6% 1 2.0%
#BOS6AB 124 113 11 91.1% 4 3.2% 1 0.8% 3 7 5.6% 2 1.8%
TOTAL 206 180 26 87.4% 5 2.4% 10 4.9% 0 2 1.0% 8 11 5.3% 3 1.7%
Retargeted (R)codes ending in R 54 leads · 2 bad · 3.7% · 2 booked · Net: 3.8%
CodeInGoodBadGood %RejRej%RemRem%BlockedBlk%DupDup%OtherOOAOOA%BookedNet Book %
#BO3CX2MR 1 0 1 0.0% 1 100.0% 1
#BO3CX1FR 3 2 1 66.7% 1 33.3% 1 33.3% 1 50.0%
#BOSLP2R 12 12 0 100.0%
#BOS1FXR 22 22 0 100.0%
#BO3CX1MR 2 2 0 100.0%
#BOSKIDSXR 5 5 0 100.0% 1 20.0%
#BOSSNAPR 5 5 0 100.0%
#BOSDXR 3 3 0 100.0%
#BOSPXR 1 1 0 100.0%
TOTAL 54 52 2 96.3% 0 2 3.7% 0 1 1.9% 1 0 2 3.8%
Boston — Top Rejection Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
DO NOT CALL1550.0%
DUPLICATE Lead723.3%
Wrong Number413.3%
Been to Us Already310.0%
Too Young13.3%
Boston — Top Removal Reasons
ReasonCount%Bar
Duplicate5337.1%
Blocked3121.7%
Inappropriate2014.0%
Pro portfolio1711.9%
Previous Client139.1%
Too young/old53.5%
No Photo32.1%
Spam10.7%
Blue Rooms — Leads In
4,983
40 codes
Usable
3,910
78.5%
Non-Usable
1,073
21.5%
Rejected
69
Removed
597
171 dup · 199 blk
OOA
439
Booked
266
Net: 6.8%
Blue Rooms — Worst Offending Codes (sorted by non-usable count — click any header to re-sort)
CodeCityInRejRej%RemRem%BlockedDupOtherOOABadBad %Booked
#ATKIDSX Atlanta 295 10 3.4% 10 207 212 71.9%
#AT1FX Atlanta 147 1 0.7% 16 10.9% 8 8 106 112 76.2%
#DAL1FX Dallas 301 15 5.0% 66 21.9% 25 26 15 15 94 31.2% 16
#CHI1FX Chicago 212 1 0.5% 65 30.7% 23 22 20 16 80 37.7% 3
#FL1FX Florida 301 1 0.3% 72 23.9% 30 22 20 73 24.3% 16
#ORL1FX Florida 327 3 0.9% 64 19.6% 21 28 15 3 70 21.4% 15
#HOU1FX Houston 173 2 1.2% 61 35.3% 22 14 25 9 69 39.9% 9
#NY1FX New York 232 6 2.6% 57 24.6% 22 13 22 8 68 29.3% 14
#BOS1FX Boston 295 5 1.7% 62 21.0% 24 19 19 67 22.7% 10
#NA1FX Nashville 164 3 1.8% 38 23.2% 8 8 22 3 42 25.6% 12
#FLKIDSX Florida 593 4 0.7% 28 4.7% 5 5 18 7 38 6.4% 20
#HOUKIDSX Houston 334 5 1.5% 13 3.9% 1 5 7 11 29 8.7% 17
#NYKIDSX New York 396 7 1.8% 9 2.3% 2 7 13 28 7.1% 56
#DALKIDSX Dallas 286 10 3.5% 8 2.8% 3 5 9 26 9.1% 18
#CHIKIDSX Chicago 296 1 0.3% 5 1.7% 2 3 20 25 8.4% 6
#NAKIDSX Nashville 191 8 4.2% 1 3 4 12 20 10.5% 27
#BOSKIDSX Boston 177 1 0.6% 5 2.8% 2 3 6 3.4% 12
#BOSSNAP Boston 30 1 3.3% 3 10.0% 1 2 4 13.3%
#ORLSNAP Florida 25 2 8.0% 1 4.0% 1 3 12.0% 1
#CHISNAP Chicago 36 3 8.3% 2 1 3 8.3% 2
#HOUGX Houston 5 1 20.0% 1 20.0%
#FLSNAP Florida 8 1 12.5% 1 1 12.5% 1
#NYSNAP New York 14 1 7.1% 1 1 7.1%
#DALSNAP Dallas 46 1 2.2% 1 1 2.2% 6
#BOSSNAPR Boston 5 0 0.0%
#BOSGX Boston 2 0 0.0%
#CHISNAPR Chicago 9 0 0.0%
#CHIGX Chicago 7 0 0.0%
#DALSNAPR Dallas 5 0 0.0%
#DALGX Dallas 5 0 0.0%
#FLSNAPR Florida 2 0 0.0%
#FLGX Florida 6 0 0.0%
#ORLSNAPR Florida 2 0 0.0%
#ORLGX Florida 3 0 0.0%
#HOUSNAP Houston 13 0 0.0% 2
#HOUSNAPR Houston 4 0 0.0%
#NASSNAPR Nashville 2 0 0.0%
#NASSNAP Nashville 24 0 0.0% 2
#NASGX Nashville 1 0 0.0%
#NYSNAPR New York 9 0 0.0% 1
TOTAL 4,983 69 597 199 171 227 439 1,073 21.5% 266
Blue Rooms — Top Rejection Reasons
ReasonCount% of rejected% of leadsBar
DO NOT CALL2840.6%0.6%
Wrong Number1623.2%0.3%
DUPLICATE Lead1521.7%0.3%
Out Of State57.2%0.1%
Unemployed Undocumented34.3%0.1%
Been to Us Already11.4%0.0%
No English Spoken11.4%0.0%
Blue Rooms — Top Removal Reasons
ReasonCount% of removed% of leadsBar
Blocked19933.3%4.0%
Duplicate17128.6%3.4%
Pro portfolio10116.9%2.0%
Inappropriate549.0%1.1%
Previous Client528.7%1.0%
Too young/old162.7%0.3%
Not Suitable30.5%0.1%
Spam10.2%0.0%
Blue Rooms — By City (where this supplier's bad leads land)
CityInBadBad %BookedWorst Code
Atlanta44232473.3%0#ATKIDSX
Florida1,26718514.6%53#FL1FX
Dallas64312118.8%40#DAL1FX
Chicago56010819.3%11#CHI1FX
Houston5299918.7%28#HOU1FX
New York6519714.9%71#NY1FX
Boston5097715.1%22#BOS1FX
Nashville3826216.2%41#NA1FX
Neil Recycled — Leads In
2,080
32 codes
Usable
1,650
79.3%
Non-Usable
430
20.7%
Rejected
39
Removed
200
48 dup · 14 blk
OOA
218
Booked
45
Net: 2.7%
Neil Recycled — Worst Offending Codes (sorted by non-usable count — click any header to re-sort)
CodeCityInRejRej%RemRem%BlockedDupOtherOOABadBad %Booked
#NY6AB New York 218 1 0.5% 21 9.6% 2 10 9 29 47 21.6% 1
#CHI6AB Chicago 168 1 0.6% 27 16.1% 9 18 18 44 26.2% 2
#HOU6AB Houston 172 3 1.7% 19 11.0% 1 4 14 23 42 24.4% 3
#NA6AB Nashville 128 2 1.6% 12 9.4% 2 1 9 26 38 29.7% 2
#DAL6AB Dallas 133 1 0.8% 24 18.0% 2 3 19 15 38 28.6% 1
#FL6AB Florida 158 6 3.8% 18 11.4% 1 3 14 9 33 20.9%
#NYN1N New York 82 1 1.2% 9 11.0% 1 1 7 12 18 22.0% 5
#NAN1N Nashville 47 2 4.3% 6 12.8% 6 13 17 36.2%
#ORL6AB Florida 89 9 10.1% 2 2 5 9 17 19.1% 4
#CHIN1N Chicago 71 6 8.5% 2 1 3 8 14 19.7% 1
#FLN1N Florida 55 5 9.1% 8 14.5% 1 2 5 1 13 23.6% 2
#HOUN1N Houston 66 6 9.1% 2 4 7 12 18.2% 1
#BOS6AB Boston 124 4 3.2% 1 3 7 11 8.9% 2
#ORLN1N Florida 57 1 1.8% 5 8.8% 2 3 5 10 17.5%
#NYCMN New York 42 4 9.5% 6 9 21.4% 2
#HOU5AB Houston 43 1 2.3% 5 11.6% 2 3 3 9 20.9% 1
#DALN1N Dallas 65 5 7.7% 1 4 4 9 13.8% 1
#NY5AB New York 51 4 7.8% 1 3 3 7 13.7% 5
#BOSN1N Boston 55 4 7.3% 1 3 2 6 10.9% 1
#BOS5AB Boston 13 1 7.7% 2 15.4% 2 2 5 38.5%
#CHICMN Chicago 24 2 8.3% 1 1 3 5 20.8% 3
#BOSCMN Boston 14 4 28.6% 4 28.6%
#ORLCMN Florida 11 2 18.2% 1 3 27.3%
#NA5AB Nashville 23 1 4.3% 1 2 3 13.0% 1
#HOUCMN Houston 27 1 3.7% 3 3 11.1% 1
#CHI5AB Chicago 28 2 7.1% 1 1 1 3 10.7%
#FL5AB Florida 39 2 5.1% 1 3 7.7%
#ORL5AB Florida 10 1 10.0% 1 1 2 20.0%
#NACMN Nashville 14 2 2 14.3% 1
#DALCMN Dallas 12 1 1 8.3%
#DAL5AB Dallas 20 1 1 5.0% 3
#FLCMN Florida 21 1 4.8% 1 4.8% 2
TOTAL 2,080 39 200 14 48 138 218 430 20.7% 45
Neil Recycled — Top Rejection Reasons
ReasonCount% of rejected% of leadsBar
DO NOT CALL1743.6%0.8%
DUPLICATE Lead1230.8%0.6%
Out Of State410.3%0.2%
Wrong Number37.7%0.1%
Too Young12.6%0.0%
Been to Us Already12.6%0.0%
Unemployed Undocumented12.6%0.0%
Neil Recycled — Top Removal Reasons
ReasonCount% of removed% of leadsBar
Duplicate4824.0%2.3%
Inappropriate4422.0%2.1%
No Photo2512.5%1.2%
Previous Client2512.5%1.2%
Pro portfolio2512.5%1.2%
Too young/old178.5%0.8%
Blocked147.0%0.7%
Not Suitable21.0%0.1%
Neil Recycled — By City (where this supplier's bad leads land)
CityInBadBad %BookedWorst Code
Florida4408218.6%8#FL6AB
New York3938120.6%13#NY6AB
Chicago2916622.7%6#CHI6AB
Houston3086621.4%6#HOU6AB
Nashville2126028.3%4#NA6AB
Dallas2304921.3%5#DAL6AB
Boston2062612.6%3#BOS6AB
Lead Pronto — Leads In
1,739
14 codes
Usable
1,322
76.0%
Non-Usable
417
24.0%
Rejected
55
Removed
323
165 dup · 16 blk
OOA
48
Booked
68
Net: 5.1%
Lead Pronto — Worst Offending Codes (sorted by non-usable count — click any header to re-sort)
CodeCityInRejRej%RemRem%BlockedDupOtherOOABadBad %Booked
#ORLP2 Florida 353 3 0.8% 63 17.8% 28 35 25 87 24.6% 9
#DALP2 Dallas 161 12 7.5% 48 29.8% 3 21 24 7 66 41.0% 7
#BOSLP2 Boston 222 15 6.8% 43 19.4% 4 20 19 58 26.1% 8
#HOULP2 Houston 226 6 2.7% 41 18.1% 3 20 18 5 51 22.6% 9
#FLP2 Florida 205 3 1.5% 44 21.5% 3 25 16 1 47 22.9% 6
#CHILP2 Chicago 234 4 1.7% 40 17.1% 28 12 44 18.8% 18
#NYLP2 New York 156 6 3.8% 27 17.3% 3 14 10 33 21.2% 5
#NALP2 Nashville 106 3 2.8% 14 13.2% 9 5 7 23 21.7% 4
#HOULP2R Houston 12 2 16.7% 1 8.3% 1 1 3 25.0%
#NALP2R Nashville 16 1 6.3% 1 6.3% 1 1 3 18.8% 1
#ORLP2R Florida 19 1 5.3% 1 1 2 10.5% 1
#BOSLP2R Boston 12 0 0.0%
#DALP2R Dallas 7 0 0.0%
#NYLP2R New York 10 0 0.0%
TOTAL 1,739 55 323 16 165 142 48 417 24.0% 68
Lead Pronto — Top Rejection Reasons
ReasonCount% of rejected% of leadsBar
DO NOT CALL2138.2%1.2%
Wrong Number1527.3%0.9%
DUPLICATE Lead1425.5%0.8%
Been to Us Already35.5%0.2%
Out Of State23.6%0.1%
Lead Pronto — Top Removal Reasons
ReasonCount% of removed% of leadsBar
Duplicate16551.1%9.5%
Inappropriate5717.6%3.3%
Pro portfolio4413.6%2.5%
Too young/old288.7%1.6%
Blocked165.0%0.9%
Previous Client103.1%0.6%
Not Suitable20.6%0.1%
Spam10.3%0.1%
Lead Pronto — By City (where this supplier's bad leads land)
CityInBadBad %BookedWorst Code
Florida57713623.6%16#ORLP2
Dallas1686639.3%7#DALP2
Boston2345824.8%8#BOSLP2
Houston2385422.7%9#HOULP2
Chicago2344418.8%18#CHILP2
New York1663319.9%5#NYLP2
Nashville1222621.3%5#NALP2
Alan — Leads In
1,666
147 codes
Usable
1,416
85.0%
Non-Usable
250
15.0%
Rejected
48
Removed
171
103 dup · 5 blk
OOA
40
Booked
93
Net: 6.6%
Alan — Worst Offending Codes (sorted by non-usable count — click any header to re-sort)
CodeCityInRejRej%RemRem%BlockedDupOtherOOABadBad %Booked
#DAL3CX1F Dallas 103 7 6.8% 11 10.7% 4 7 2 18 17.5% 1
#DALFB31M Dallas 57 4 7.0% 10 17.5% 9 1 14 24.6% 7
#FLFB31M Florida 71 1 1.4% 13 18.3% 10 3 14 19.7% 4
#ORLFB31M Florida 75 1 1.3% 11 14.7% 8 3 2 14 18.7% 4
#CHIFB31M Chicago 63 3 4.8% 10 15.9% 9 1 13 20.6% 6
#FL3CX1F Florida 77 12 15.6% 2 6 4 1 13 16.9% 2
#HOUFB31M Houston 91 4 4.4% 7 7.7% 4 3 2 13 14.3% 7
#DAL3CX1M Dallas 64 4 6.3% 4 6.3% 1 3 4 12 18.8% 5
#FLFB31F Florida 28 10 35.7% 7 3 10 35.7%
#NA3CX1F Nashville 24 1 4.2% 7 29.2% 4 3 1 8 33.3% 1
#HOU3CX1M Houston 31 1 3.2% 4 12.9% 1 2 1 4 8 25.8% 3
#BO3CX1F Boston 38 8 21.1% 1 3 4 8 21.1% 2
#HOUFB31F Houston 35 2 5.7% 3 8.6% 2 1 2 7 20.0%
#HOU3CX1F Houston 48 1 2.1% 4 8.3% 4 2 7 14.6% 5
#FL3CX1M Florida 46 5 10.9% 2 3 1 6 13.0% 2
#BOFB31M Boston 19 2 10.5% 3 15.8% 2 1 5 26.3% 1
#CHI3CX1F Chicago 30 3 10.0% 1 2 1 4 13.3% 1
#BOFB31F Boston 11 3 27.3% 2 1 3 27.3%
#CHIKIDSXR Chicago 16 2 12.5% 1 3 18.8%
#CHIFB31F Chicago 22 1 4.5% 2 9.1% 1 1 3 13.6%
#DAL3CX2F Dallas 3 2 66.7% 1 1 2 66.7%
#FL3CX3F Florida 4 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 1 2 50.0%
#FL3CX2F Florida 4 1 25.0% 1 25.0% 1 2 50.0%
#DAL3CX3F Dallas 5 1 20.0% 1 1 2 40.0%
#NAFB31F Nashville 5 2 40.0% 2 2 40.0%
#NAFB32F Nashville 5 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 1 2 40.0%
#DALFB32F Dallas 6 2 33.3% 1 1 2 33.3%
#BOFB32F Boston 7 2 28.6% 1 1 2 28.6%
#DALFB31F Dallas 8 2 25.0% 2 2 25.0%
#NA3CX1M Nashville 12 1 8.3% 1 1 2 16.7% 1
#DAL1FXR Dallas 15 1 6.7% 1 1 2 13.3% 1
#DALFB32M Dallas 19 2 10.5% 2 2 10.5%
#NAFB31M Nashville 25 1 4.0% 1 4.0% 1 1 2 8.0% 1
#CHI1FXR Chicago 30 1 3.3% 1 1 2 6.7% 2
#BO3CX1M Boston 31 2 6.5% 1 1 2 6.5% 2
#NYKIDSXR New York 40 2 5.0% 2 2 5.0% 2
#BO3CX2MR Boston 1 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%
#CHI3CX3F Chicago 1 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%
#DALKIDS Dallas 1 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%
#DAL4AB Dallas 1 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%
#DALFB33F Dallas 1 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%
#FLGXR Florida 1 1 100.0% 1 100.0%
#HOU3DE1M Houston 1 1 100.0% 1 100.0% 1 1 100.0%
#FLFB31FR Florida 2 1 50.0% 1 50.0%
#HOU3CX2M Houston 2 1 50.0% 1 1 50.0%
#HOUGXR Houston 2 1 50.0% 1 50.0%
#HOUFB32FR Houston 2 1 1 50.0%
#BO3CX3F Boston 3 1 33.3% 1 33.3%
#BO3CX1FR Boston 3 1 33.3% 1 1 33.3% 1
#DALFB31FR Dallas 3 1 33.3% 1 1 33.3%
#HOUFB32MR Houston 3 1 1 33.3%
#HOU3CX1FR Houston 3 1 1 33.3%
#NADXR Nashville 3 1 33.3% 1 1 33.3%
#NA3CX1MR Nashville 3 1 1 33.3%
#NY3CX1F New York 3 1 33.3% 1 1 33.3%
#NY3CX1M New York 3 1 1 33.3%
#NA3CX2F Nashville 4 1 25.0% 1 25.0%
#DAL3CX2M Dallas 5 1 20.0% 1 1 20.0%
#ORLFB32F Florida 8 1 1 12.5%
#CHIFB32M Chicago 9 1 11.1% 1 1 11.1% 1
#FLFB32F Florida 9 1 11.1% 1 1 11.1%
#HOUFB32M Houston 10 1 10.0% 1 1 10.0%
#FLFB31MR Florida 11 1 9.1% 1 9.1% 1
#NA1FXR Nashville 12 1 8.3% 1 1 8.3% 2
#ORLFB31MR Florida 15 1 1 6.7%
#HOU1FXR Houston 15 1 1 6.7%
#CHI3CX1M Chicago 19 1 1 5.3% 2
#DALKIDSXR Dallas 22 1 4.5% 1 1 4.5% 4
#ORLFB31F Florida 22 1 4.5% 1 1 4.5% 1
#ORL1FXR Florida 30 1 3.3% 1 1 3.3% 2
#FLKIDSXR Florida 36 1 2.8% 1 1 2.8% 3
#BOS1FXR Boston 22 0 0.0%
#BO3CX1MR Boston 2 0 0.0%
#BOSKIDSXR Boston 5 0 0.0% 1
#BO3CX3M Boston 1 0 0.0%
#BOFB32M Boston 3 0 0.0%
#BOSDXR Boston 3 0 0.0%
#BO3CX2F Boston 1 0 0.0%
#BOSPXR Boston 1 0 0.0%
#CHIFB32F Chicago 7 0 0.0% 2
#CHIFB31MR Chicago 3 0 0.0%
#CHIFB32MR Chicago 2 0 0.0%
#CHIFB33FR Chicago 1 0 0.0%
#CHI3CX3M Chicago 2 0 0.0% 1
#CHI3CX1MR Chicago 1 0 0.0%
#CHIDXR Chicago 3 0 0.0%
#CHI3CX2M Chicago 2 0 0.0%
#CHIGXR Chicago 2 0 0.0%
#CHI3CX1FR Chicago 1 0 0.0%
#CHI3CX2F Chicago 2 0 0.0%
#CHIFB33F Chicago 1 0 0.0%
#CHIFB33M Chicago 1 0 0.0%
#DALFB32FR Dallas 1 0 0.0%
#DALGXR Dallas 4 0 0.0% 1
#DALDXR Dallas 1 0 0.0%
#DAL3CX2FR Dallas 2 0 0.0%
#DALFB31MR Dallas 2 0 0.0%
#DAL3CX1FR Dallas 5 0 0.0% 1
#DAL3CX1MR Dallas 1 0 0.0% 1
#DALFB32MR Dallas 2 0 0.0%
#FL1FXR Florida 39 0 0.0% 3
#FLDXR Florida 3 0 0.0%
#ORLGXR Florida 4 0 0.0%
#ORL4IG31MR Florida 1 0 0.0%
#ORLDXR Florida 3 0 0.0%
#FL01R Florida 2 0 0.0%
#FL3CX3FR Florida 1 0 0.0%
#FL3CX1FR Florida 1 0 0.0%
#FL3CX2M Florida 1 0 0.0%
#FL4IG32FR Florida 1 0 0.0%
#FL3CX1MR Florida 3 0 0.0%
#ORL4IG31FR Florida 1 0 0.0%
#ORLFB31FR Florida 1 0 0.0%
#ORLFB32FR Florida 3 0 0.0%
#FLFB32FR Florida 2 0 0.0%
#HOUFB32F Houston 11 0 0.0% 1
#HOUPXR Houston 1 0 0.0%
#HOUFB33M Houston 1 0 0.0%
#HOUKXR Houston 1 0 0.0%
#HOUFB31MR Houston 4 0 0.0%
#HOUFB31FR Houston 2 0 0.0%
#HOUKIDSXR Houston 3 0 0.0%
#HOU3CX2MR Houston 1 0 0.0%
#HOUFB33FR Houston 1 0 0.0%
#HOU3CX2F Houston 1 0 0.0%
#HOU3CX1MR Houston 1 0 0.0%
#HOUFB33F Houston 1 0 0.0%
#NAFB32MR Nashville 3 0 0.0%
#NAFB32M Nashville 12 0 0.0% 2
#NASGXR Nashville 4 0 0.0%
#NAKIDSXR Nashville 5 0 0.0% 2
#NA3CX1FR Nashville 3 0 0.0%
#NAFB33FR Nashville 2 0 0.0%
#NAFB32FR Nashville 1 0 0.0%
#NAFB31MR Nashville 1 0 0.0%
#NA3CX3F Nashville 1 0 0.0%
#NAFB33MR Nashville 2 0 0.0%
#NA4ABR Nashville 1 0 0.0%
#NAFB31FR Nashville 1 0 0.0%
#NY1FXR New York 4 0 0.0% 1
#NY3CX1FR New York 3 0 0.0%
#NYKPXR New York 1 0 0.0%
#NY3CX1MR New York 1 0 0.0%
#NYFB32M New York 2 0 0.0%
#NYFB31M New York 2 0 0.0%
#NY3CX2M New York 1 0 0.0%
#NY3CX2F New York 1 0 0.0%
TOTAL 1,666 48 171 5 103 63 40 250 15.0% 93
Alan — Top Rejection Reasons
ReasonCount% of rejected% of leadsBar
DUPLICATE Lead1429.2%0.8%
Wrong Number1020.8%0.6%
Been to Us Already816.7%0.5%
DO NOT CALL714.6%0.4%
Out Of State612.5%0.4%
Unemployed Undocumented36.3%0.2%
Alan — Top Removal Reasons
ReasonCount% of removed% of leadsBar
Duplicate10360.2%6.2%
Pro portfolio2715.8%1.6%
Inappropriate1810.5%1.1%
Previous Client127.0%0.7%
Blocked52.9%0.3%
Too young/old52.9%0.3%
Not Suitable10.6%0.1%
Alan — By City (where this supplier's bad leads land)
CityInBadBad %BookedWorst Code
Florida5057013.9%22#FLFB31M
Dallas3316218.7%21#DAL3CX1F
Houston2714315.9%16#HOUFB31M
Chicago2182812.8%15#CHIFB31M
Boston1512315.2%7#BO3CX1F
Nashville1292015.5%9#NA3CX1F
New York6146.6%3#NYKIDSXR
Organic — Leads In
81
1 codes
Usable
51
63.0%
Non-Usable
30
37.0%
Rejected
11
Removed
16
9 dup · 2 blk
OOA
6
Booked
3
Net: 5.9%
Organic — Worst Offending Codes (sorted by non-usable count — click any header to re-sort)
CodeCityInRejRej%RemRem%BlockedDupOtherOOABadBad %Booked
#FL01 Florida 81 11 13.6% 16 19.8% 2 9 5 6 30 37.0% 3
TOTAL 81 11 16 2 9 5 6 30 37.0% 3
Organic — Top Rejection Reasons
ReasonCount% of rejected% of leadsBar
DUPLICATE Lead763.6%8.6%
Too Young19.1%1.2%
Wrong Number19.1%1.2%
Been to Us Already19.1%1.2%
Out Of State19.1%1.2%
Organic — Top Removal Reasons
ReasonCount% of removed% of leadsBar
Duplicate956.3%11.1%
Previous Client318.8%3.7%
Blocked212.5%2.5%
Inappropriate16.3%1.2%
Pro portfolio16.3%1.2%
Organic — By City (where this supplier's bad leads land)
CityInBadBad %BookedWorst Code
Florida813037.0%3#FL01
Net Book % = bookings / usable leads  ·  Bad = unique leads that are rejected, removed, or OOA (deduplicated — each lead counted once)  ·  Usable = leads in − bad  ·  Only leads that arrived in this period are counted
Generated 9/19/2026, 6:09:18 AM  ·  CRM: Onyx Black  ·  7 days  ·  OOA: >200mi  ·  7007 zips cached